1. Be cool and Register to set your username and display picture get the full features of the site. Talk Bulldogs NRL News, match reviews, live score, ladder, injuries, player signings and team performance.

NRL’s richest clubs are exploiting medical retirements

Discussion in 'Rugby League General' started by Heckler, Nov 3, 2019.

  1. Heckler

    Heckler Kennel Enthusiast Gilded Premium Member

    Oct 13, 2014
    Likes Received:
    Monday Buzz: NRL’s richest clubs are exploiting medical retirements

    It was always going to be an issue once the NRL allowed Greg Inglis to retire and be taken out of the salary cap. Now the floodgates have opened and the problem is not going away.

    The NRL’s medical retirement rules have become a sham and nothing but a salary cap loophole for the wealthier clubs.

    This was always going to be a problem once the NRL allowed Greg Inglis to retire last year and be taken out of the salary cap.
    The Rabbitohs had signed Inglis on a long-term contract to keep him out of reach of rival clubs. They knew he was getting to an age where it was a risk but they still chose to take him off the market.

    Last week we had three more cases – Sam Burgess at Souths, Ben Matulino at the Wests Tigers and Matt Gillett at the Brisbane Broncos.
    We are not saying these are not genuine cases. That’s for the NRL to work out.

    But let’s use a player like Kiwi Test front-rower Jared Waerea-Hargreaves as an example to show how easy it could be to rort the system.

    He is 30 years of age and off contract at the end of next year. A number of clubs would love to sign the enforcer from the side that has won back-to-back premierships.

    But like Inglis, Burgess and other older players, there are risks.
    Obviously it’s in Trent Robinson’s and Nick Politis’s best interests to take him off the market.

    So they sign him for five years, knowing at most he’ll play another three. Like Inglis, he’ll have a busted body and will be medically retired.
    The problem we have is that not all clubs can afford to do what the Roosters can and pay him out a couple of million. It’s a round of drinks for them.

    The Rabbitohs are privately owned by Russell Crowe and James Packer and can afford it too. Same with the Broncos, the wealthiest club in the game.
    The NRL knows this is potentially a major problem.

    It’s why they are saying an investigation into the Burgess case will not be completed until next month. They want to study all the surgery and physio records.

    They want to interview medical experts to determine if there were other options that could have allowed him to continue playing.

    It took five weeks for the Broncos to get approval from the NRL for Gillett’s retirement and release from the salary cap.

    The NRL have rejected claims before. In 2017 Manly had to keep Brett Stewart in the salary cap despite a career ending knee injury. The same with Anthony Watmough at Parramatta.

    Yet now the floodgates have opened and it is a problem for the game that is not going away.

    Your columnist was laughed at and labelled soft for posing the question earlier this year: “Is rugby league getting too tough?”

    Bigger, stronger, faster more powerful athletes are clashing and colliding with the most brutal force.
    In most positions players are 25 kilos heavier than 30 years ago.

    Even old super coach Wayne Bennett now recognises the problems with the increasing number of shoulder injuries.

    “A lot of players are having multiple operations on their shoulder,” Bennett said.

    “It’s something we need to look at and why this type of injury is happening and finishing guys’ careers a lot earlier than we all thought they would.”

    Poor Kieran Foran did his shoulder again on the weekend. Will the Bulldogs try to medically retire him? Give him a job after footy. This would free up $1 million to get Latrell Mitchell straight away.

    So the ball is now in the NRL’s court. There is a perception in the game that Todd Greenberg has a soft spot for the Rabbitohs.

    The Greg Inglis reference in court for drink driving a speeding. Sam Burgess escaping punishment despite slamming the judiciary etc, etc.

    All the fans want is consistency. Every club and every player to be treated the same, which hasn’t been the case in the past.
    • Like Like x 5
  2. Sleeky

    Sleeky Kennel Enthusiast Premium Member

    Oct 12, 2005
    Likes Received:
    Everyone knows it, makes us all geniuses
  3. Bulldog_4_Life

    Bulldog_4_Life Kennel Addict

    Apr 18, 2014
    Likes Received:
    Too much of a grey area tbh, where do you draw the line?

    If Foran is able to make a recovery and return in 2020 then why should we be allowed to medically retire him? But then at what point will the NRL step in and stop Foran from ending up in a wheelchair because he refused to give up the sport despite his body being broken down. Should we then be punished for it and it be included in our cap even though it was not from any wrongdoing from our end?

    The NRL can not judge each case individually unless they want to cop it even more for being biased. Surely they'd hire independent doctors to advise them on their decisions.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. JackDog

    JackDog Kennel Enthusiast

    Sep 24, 2016
    Likes Received:
    And here we go, as soon as there is a chance the dogs might use the medical retirement option, it’s a brought up as a problem.
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Like Like x 3
  5. Moedogg

    Moedogg Kennel Immortal

    Apr 6, 2012
    Likes Received:
    Haha watch the NRL move the goalposts as soon as they see that it will give an advantage to the dogs..
    • Agree Agree x 6
  6. Rodzilla

    Rodzilla Terry Lamb 1996

    Dec 22, 2004
    Likes Received:
    imagine how much better it would be if they got rid of the salary cap

    its like 180% less worry
    • Like Like x 4
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. MatstaDogg

    MatstaDogg The Bearded Baker Premium Member

    Sep 28, 2008
    Likes Received:
    At least he called out Toddy on his and the NRLs favouritism of the Rabbits, even though we all already knew it.

    Bet when it comes to us and Foran, we'll get knocked back if we tried retiring him by the NRLOL.
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Psycho Doggie

    Psycho Doggie Kennel Addict

    Mar 25, 2014
    Likes Received:
    I think that this is where it will probably go, an independent body. Bulldogs can actually push for a renewed focus on player wellbeing, which will be a refreshing change given the way some players have been treated by their clubs in recent times. It will also demonstrate that clubs can work with players instead of cutting them loose, and therefore put pressure on the NRL and other clubs.
  9. Scoooby

    Scoooby Kennel Immortal Gilded Premium Member

    Mar 6, 2018
    Likes Received:
    Wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest anymore haha... no matter how ridiculous it’s sounds..!!
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Tazer

    Tazer Kennel Regular

    Jul 3, 2006
    Likes Received:
    Someone should ask Rothfool what's worse.....medically retiring an elite player who is clearly unable to perform anymore or systematically and intentionally rorting the cap for 3 years running like his beloved sharkies did? The truth is they were very lucky they didn't have their one and only premiership stripped. Their punishment for this systematic rorting was having their cap reduced by 700K over 2 years (or 350K a year). The whole premise of any club having to carry the cost of a player who can't actually play anymore in their cap is ludicrous, and would actually result in a punishment orders of magnitude greater than what intentional rorting of the cap entails (if we take the Sharks as an example).
    • Best Post Best Post x 1
  11. The_Chimpster

    The_Chimpster Kennel Addict

    Mar 12, 2015
    Likes Received:
    With this farcical game, and the current admin anything can happen
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page