• Be cool and Register to set your username and display picture get the full features of the site. Talk Bulldogs NRL News, match reviews, live score, ladder, injuries, player signings and team performance.

NRL’s richest clubs are exploiting medical retirements

Heckler

Kennel Addict
Premium Member
Gilded
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
3,049
Reaction score
1,893
Monday Buzz: NRL’s richest clubs are exploiting medical retirements

It was always going to be an issue once the NRL allowed Greg Inglis to retire and be taken out of the salary cap. Now the floodgates have opened and the problem is not going away.

The NRL’s medical retirement rules have become a sham and nothing but a salary cap loophole for the wealthier clubs.

This was always going to be a problem once the NRL allowed Greg Inglis to retire last year and be taken out of the salary cap.
The Rabbitohs had signed Inglis on a long-term contract to keep him out of reach of rival clubs. They knew he was getting to an age where it was a risk but they still chose to take him off the market.

Last week we had three more cases – Sam Burgess at Souths, Ben Matulino at the Wests Tigers and Matt Gillett at the Brisbane Broncos.
We are not saying these are not genuine cases. That’s for the NRL to work out.

But let’s use a player like Kiwi Test front-rower Jared Waerea-Hargreaves as an example to show how easy it could be to rort the system.

He is 30 years of age and off contract at the end of next year. A number of clubs would love to sign the enforcer from the side that has won back-to-back premierships.

But like Inglis, Burgess and other older players, there are risks.
Obviously it’s in Trent Robinson’s and Nick Politis’s best interests to take him off the market.

So they sign him for five years, knowing at most he’ll play another three. Like Inglis, he’ll have a busted body and will be medically retired.
The problem we have is that not all clubs can afford to do what the Roosters can and pay him out a couple of million. It’s a round of drinks for them.

The Rabbitohs are privately owned by Russell Crowe and James Packer and can afford it too. Same with the Broncos, the wealthiest club in the game.
The NRL knows this is potentially a major problem.

It’s why they are saying an investigation into the Burgess case will not be completed until next month. They want to study all the surgery and physio records.

They want to interview medical experts to determine if there were other options that could have allowed him to continue playing.

It took five weeks for the Broncos to get approval from the NRL for Gillett’s retirement and release from the salary cap.

The NRL have rejected claims before. In 2017 Manly had to keep Brett Stewart in the salary cap despite a career ending knee injury. The same with Anthony Watmough at Parramatta.

Yet now the floodgates have opened and it is a problem for the game that is not going away.

Your columnist was laughed at and labelled soft for posing the question earlier this year: “Is rugby league getting too tough?”

Bigger, stronger, faster more powerful athletes are clashing and colliding with the most brutal force.
In most positions players are 25 kilos heavier than 30 years ago.

Even old super coach Wayne Bennett now recognises the problems with the increasing number of shoulder injuries.

“A lot of players are having multiple operations on their shoulder,” Bennett said.

“It’s something we need to look at and why this type of injury is happening and finishing guys’ careers a lot earlier than we all thought they would.”

Poor Kieran Foran did his shoulder again on the weekend. Will the Bulldogs try to medically retire him? Give him a job after footy. This would free up $1 million to get Latrell Mitchell straight away.

So the ball is now in the NRL’s court. There is a perception in the game that Todd Greenberg has a soft spot for the Rabbitohs.

The Greg Inglis reference in court for drink driving a speeding. Sam Burgess escaping punishment despite slamming the judiciary etc, etc.

All the fans want is consistency. Every club and every player to be treated the same, which hasn’t been the case in the past.
 

Sleeky

Kennel Enthusiast
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
2,882
Reaction score
831
Everyone knows it, makes us all geniuses
 

Bulldog_4_Life

Kennel Addict
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
4,162
Reaction score
2,802
Too much of a grey area tbh, where do you draw the line?

If Foran is able to make a recovery and return in 2020 then why should we be allowed to medically retire him? But then at what point will the NRL step in and stop Foran from ending up in a wheelchair because he refused to give up the sport despite his body being broken down. Should we then be punished for it and it be included in our cap even though it was not from any wrongdoing from our end?

The NRL can not judge each case individually unless they want to cop it even more for being biased. Surely they'd hire independent doctors to advise them on their decisions.
 

Moedogg

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
6,019
Reaction score
3,246
Haha watch the NRL move the goalposts as soon as they see that it will give an advantage to the dogs..
 

MatstaDogg

The Bearded Baker
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
7,008
Reaction score
2,634
At least he called out Toddy on his and the NRLs favouritism of the Rabbits, even though we all already knew it.

Bet when it comes to us and Foran, we'll get knocked back if we tried retiring him by the NRLOL.
 

Psycho Doggie

Kennel Addict
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,355
Reaction score
1,871
Too much of a grey area tbh, where do you draw the line?

If Foran is able to make a recovery and return in 2020 then why should we be allowed to medically retire him? But then at what point will the NRL step in and stop Foran from ending up in a wheelchair because he refused to give up the sport despite his body being broken down. Should we then be punished for it and it be included in our cap even though it was not from any wrongdoing from our end?

The NRL can not judge each case individually unless they want to cop it even more for being biased. Surely they'd hire independent doctors to advise them on their decisions.
I think that this is where it will probably go, an independent body. Bulldogs can actually push for a renewed focus on player wellbeing, which will be a refreshing change given the way some players have been treated by their clubs in recent times. It will also demonstrate that clubs can work with players instead of cutting them loose, and therefore put pressure on the NRL and other clubs.
 

Scoooby

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Gilded
Joined
Mar 6, 2018
Messages
8,652
Reaction score
5,602
Haha watch the NRL move the goalposts as soon as they see that it will give an advantage to the dogs..
Wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest anymore haha... no matter how ridiculous it’s sounds..!!
 

Tazer

Kennel Regular
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
241
Reaction score
105
Someone should ask Rothfool what's worse.....medically retiring an elite player who is clearly unable to perform anymore or systematically and intentionally rorting the cap for 3 years running like his beloved sharkies did? The truth is they were very lucky they didn't have their one and only premiership stripped. Their punishment for this systematic rorting was having their cap reduced by 700K over 2 years (or 350K a year). The whole premise of any club having to carry the cost of a player who can't actually play anymore in their cap is ludicrous, and would actually result in a punishment orders of magnitude greater than what intentional rorting of the cap entails (if we take the Sharks as an example).
 
Top