Well he can't hit him. Simple (much like "Buzz").
Reminds me of that old adage (which I just made up today):
"Muhammad Ali would have won no bouts if the other guy had a 9mm Beretta; he wouldn't be trying to punch him if the other bloke could shoot him"
I think both observations are equally relevant to their situations (as in not...)
Ali was a boxer participating in a sport against a trained willing participant of equal size and weight.
It's a little different but I do get the point you are making.
Look,
In life people don't always agree with each other and disagreement is normal.
How you deal with that tells a lot about your character and often intelligence level.
If you are a much bigger and capable physically in an altercation, and that's your go to reaction. Then your a bully, and not very intelligent.
Where's to glory it beating up a much smaller person who got under your skin?
There is no glory in that,
And if you think there is, you are an even bigger idiot.
Chimpanzees settle squabbles through violence and the leader of the group is always the biggest and strongest of them all.
They are animals, and that's how animals behave because they don't have the intelligence to work through things another way.
We are intelligent humans who can think about things and solve problems.
We have the ability to solve problems without violence.
Choosing violence to solve a problem is stupid.
