I think he possible saved a few and he did make some good defensive calls. I think some are blinded by their hatred of players to certain facts. I know I was frustrated watching him give multiple sets of 6 on our tryline.I dont think casey was that bad they attacked his side all night ,, how many tries did they score........
He could also have been sent off and cost us the game, discipline is everything.Grub is a legend!
No, he was very good.No, he was very poor.
In an average of 44 minutes RFM's stats;What does RFM bring to the team. He has done bugger all for us so far this season
Reynolds is a footballer....has a brain full of ideas, HOWEVER, would not PC enough for today's game.Reynolds has never been nor will be the perfect traditional halfback...
But no one can deny he is one of the most inspirational Bulldogs ever !!!
To all the negative Nancys " It's due you showed him some credit ! "
Stood up yesterday. Wasn’t doing his crabbing across the field like he does sometimes. Might of been brought up at trainingIn an average of 44 minutes RFM's stats;
TACKLES MADE 205
TACKLE EFFICIENCY 94.5% (the same as King)
AVERAGE RUNNING METRES 82 (that's equivalent to 150 metres for 80 minutes).
POST CONTACT METRES 30 ((that's equivalent to 54 metres for 80 minutes).
That's lot more than bugger all.
Always a Bulldog
Unfortunately, the rules changes has almost fazed out the intelligent players out of the game.Reynolds is a footballer....has a brain full of ideas, HOWEVER, would not PC enough for today's game.
He is so much better than Flanagan. His brain explosions are mitigated by plays he comes up with & the passion he brings. At least he brings SOMETHING. Flanagan was the definition of a passanger and a waste of a spot.Lol Reynolds is a brain explosion waiting to happen.
KO should be 5/8. I’m glad Flannagan is gone but Reynolds isn’t that much better
Missed too many tackles, did nothing special in attack. Poor as usual.No, he was very good.
How Reynolds was utilised by CC last weekend was probably the best way to do so. Over the course of 80 minutes he will invariably do things to piss off the ref. I reckon he would've definitely been binned if he was on for most of the second half.He is so much better than Flanagan. His brain explosions are mitigated by plays he comes up with & the passion he brings. At least he brings SOMETHING. Flanagan was the definition of a passanger and a waste of a spot.
Reynolds isn't the long term answer, everyone knows that. But at least in the short term if we can get some wins + spread some of his energy across he team is a net positive.
Yes he has missed the most tackles in the nrl so far with 46, also made the most with 409 ... 10 more than anyone else.Missed too many tackles, did nothing special in attack. Poor as usual.
Made 48 tackles broke the line 3 times.Missed too many tackles, did nothing special in attack. Poor as usual.
Thanks I didn’t see this.Yes he has missed the most tackles in the nrl so far with 46, also made the most with 409 ... 10 more than anyone else.
He has lost his offload ability and remember those lines he used to run at top speed and score? I wonder if he will ever get those skills back into his game. I think for now he just needs to be consistent and he is doing that.In an average of 44 minutes RFM's stats;
TACKLES MADE 205
TACKLE EFFICIENCY 94.5% (the same as King)
AVERAGE RUNNING METRES 82 (that's equivalent to 150 metres for 80 minutes).
POST CONTACT METRES 30 ((that's equivalent to 54 metres for 80 minutes).
That's lot more than bugger all.
Always a Bulldog
Bit hard to run an edge line when you’re tasked as a 13.He has lost his offload ability and remember those lines he used to run at top speed and score? I wonder if he will ever get those skills back into his game. I think for now he just needs to be consistent and he is doing that.
No worries ...4 line break assists same cherry evens. 3 x 40/20s.. with 1,164 kick mtsThanks I didn’t see this.