This debate is not about whether or not homosexual is ethical/ok/legal/acceptable. It's simply not the topic to discuss.
The topic is whether or not it is ok to voice a religious opinion, where that religious opinion is not illegal, however it is controversial and probably quite likely to offend
I'd argue he hides his bigotry behind religious dogma. Plus folau brought into question whether homosexuality is ethical or not, so it does play a part in this.
It is my belief that this in any advanced western democratic society, this sort of behaviour is not just ok, it should be actively promoted so that everyone has an opportunity to voice their opinion in the overall public debate. From that point on, society can then best select a path forward.
Society is voicing their opinion. folau has voiced his opinon, folau's ex-teammates have voiced their opinions, RA has voiced their opinion, Go Fund Me has voiced their opinion, those donating to folau have voiced their opinion, those criticizing have voiced their opinion.
But surprise surprise folau is still free and out and about, there are no court cases to have him charged and he's still voicing his opinion. RA have also voiced their opinion, by telling folau as a representative of
RA's brand (not folaus, Rugby Australia's brand) that there are certain codes of ethics he has to abide by, otherwise he can get walking. It seems the only one trying to force their opinion on others is folau.
Also, if people are so soft that they are likely to curl up in the ball as soon as they are offended by something someone says - well I think these people need to take a good long hard look at themselves and find a better way forward.
No that is complete and utter bullshit. It's a common theme in this thread by the supporters of folau that they have shown a complete lack of empathy, a complete lack of consideration, a complete lack of respect, a complete lack of "love".
Seems you lot are quite ok with LGBT teens committing suicide and that they should just "harden up" and get on with it. Until you have walked in their shoes and copped the copious amounts of abuse they have, you have no right to comment on whether they should "harden up".
Its the Bible that clearly states homosexuality is a sin.
Society seems to be "discriminating" against those (people) who hold a the Bible as truth.
Do Christians have to "change who they are" because society does not like the Bible?
No one has said that. They've said have your beliefs, don't force them onto others, keep it in your homes and don't partake in discriminating public speech. It's fairly simple right?
And I find it quite ironic that you're complaining about discrimination over a minuscule item such as this when compared to the recent history (past 40 to 50 years) of consistent discrimination the LGBT community have copped, mostly at the hands of religious folk.
Would people actually be speaking about your religion if folau had kept his mouth shut? The rest of us non-religious folk, respect your right to belief, we just don't want to hear your religions bigotry (quite frankly that's what we see it as, bigotry) targeted at other people in a public forum.
In this situation the only place where I'm going to defend folau is when the media made an article of a video on his church's facebook page. Folau was given a sermon (about homosexuals), inside his church and his church posted that video on their facebook page. That's fair game, why?
1. He's no longer an employee of RA,hence no obligations to RA in representing RA's code of conduct
2. It's inside his church
3. It's his church's facebook page, the general populace knows what to expect from his church and so if visiting their page, that type of belief content should be expected
So I disagree with the media trying to promote that as another article in reference to the current situation.