Explanation on referring decision

[KiwiDog7]

Penalty count was 6-2 in favour of Knights

Set rstarts 4-1 in favour of Knights not to mention 3 out of that 4 were given on the 5th tackle
Add in the no six again ruling when Kikau made the break in first half plus video ref ruling on a forward pass for the first time in NRL history

 

[alwaysthesun]

Penalty count was 6-2 in favour of Knights

Set rstarts 4-1 in favour of Knights not to mention 3 out of that 4 were given on the 5th tackle
Add in the no six again ruling when Kikau made the break in first half plus video ref ruling on a forward pass for the first time in NRL history

wonder if the ref will get the Casey Badger treatment

 

[Papa Joe]

That's right...... absolute Bullshit!!!

 

[Cujo]

Knights first try was after a six again call by the ref, for the Dogs being "offside" on the last tackle

Safiti was tackled and played the ball on the last, one metre from the Dogs goal line

Can someone please explain to me, how can any player be "offside" when the opposition player is playing the ball 1 metre from your tryline?

I thought the same! I actually stopped & rewound the match to watch again at the time as I couldn’t see how it could be called!!

 

[John Matrix]

What’s going to be the excuse for the bunker, I thought they weren’t allowed to rule of forwards.

 

[King Gus]

Seriously
What the actual fuck.
Only against us will you see a situation where the bunker rules on a forward pass.

You will never ever see it again

Yes you will , you will see it in another bulldog’s game.

 

[Bozzo]

also bunker can rule on a forward pass now

Apparently... I can't think of the game but I'm pretty sure they've done this to us before as well...

 

[maroondog72]

We got fkd all day and still won

And it wasn’t just a win we flogged the cahunts

 

[JORDZILLA]

Apparently... I can't think of the game but I'm pretty sure they've done this to us before as well...

Yeah someone on here mention that they ruled on a Kasiano forward pass couple years back... happens only to us

 

[Chrisaaar]

I was at the game and haven't seen the replay, but I'm not sure they were calling it a forward pass, I thought they said it was a knock on and the ball went forward (with the knock coming from Crichton's chin).. that's why we got our challenge back... Maybe I just misheard the explanation

 

[CQDog]

The Greg Marshew challenge was a farce

 

[battered sav]

It could just be me but referees seem to become a little mentally defective whenever they adjudicate our games. Ciro should ask for a pregame mental assessment of all officials including the bunker every week. I'm starting to become concerned for their welfare. Truly!

 

[wendog33]

Here's another one. Our players are at the forefront of dodgy decisions other teams aren"t.

 

[justdogs]

Seriously
What the actual fuck.
Only against us will you see a situation where the bunker rules on a forward pass.

You will never ever see it again

I can't wait for they explanation ( if they give us one, lol)

 

[ChesoBulldog]

Penalty count was 6-2 in favour of Knights

Set rstarts 4-1 in favour of Knights not to mention 3 out of that 4 were given on the 5th tackle
Add in the no six again ruling when Kikau made the break in first half plus video ref ruling on a forward pass for the first time in NRL history

Yeah I noticed in the first half he let Knights lay all over the Dogs, and as soon as Dogs lay on Knights for an extra second its a 6 again. The offside 6 again call that led to Knights first try was total BS.

But I loved seeing Dogs show some resolve and not let their heads down even when the ref was biased against them. Stuck with it and got it done.

 

[EXPLORER]

I can't wait for they explanation ( if they give us one, lol)

They apparently ruled it a knock on, not a pass
What the actual fuck

 

[Kempsey Dog]

Here's another one. Our players are at the forefront of dodgy decisions other teams aren"t.View attachment 107186

This gets a proper sin bin and we arguably win this game... Same goes for Souths with either Wighton or Tass.

 

[InGusWeTrust]

Imagine how much better this sport would be if they didn’t keep fucking with a great thing?! Always gotta be introducing new rules, with 90% of them being rubbish.

The worst it’s ever been though, since they brought in bunker overrules and set restarts. Ironically because of a try Souths were awarded against us, which was shown as clearly wrong after the fact.

I don’t know about you guys but when a try is scored now, most of my attention is on the bottom of screen waiting to see ‘try confirmed’. This is fkn mental, to not be able to celebrate in case it’s overturned, or be hoping that it is if the opposition have scored. It’s bush league ludicrous shit.

Then you have set restarts which is just a licence for the ref to manipulate the game as they please. So you’re telling me every one of them would have been a penalty before set restarts were introduced? At least a penalty can be scrutinised in the time it’s given until resumption of play. 6 agains simply allow for giving legups!

I find it constantly frustrating watching games these days.

 

[Lynchpin]

There shouldn't be SET re-starts at all.
There should be single tackle nullification; meaning if the ref determines you've infringed in the ruck, THAT tackle doesn't count (You infringed on tackle 4, have another tackle).

Then, if there's ongoing infringements, the ref can still penalise as needed.
But equally, if the attacking team is cheating in the ruck (eg walking off the mark, either through or to the side of the markers), then the markers are immediately onside and can tackle without penalty and the defensive line is immediately on side (no inside 10m).

There needs to be balance and fairness between attack and defence.

 

[The DoggFather]

Has that head corrupt **** came out and explained their "errors" yet?