dhoo8450
Kennel Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,649
- Reaction score
- 2,510
Yeah fair enough, I see your point. I still disagree that Graham was at fault in any way in this case though. Yes, he came into contact with the legs but it's fairly obvious that someone attempting a charge down needs to get pretty close to the kicker otherwise the ball is going to sail over their head. To me it was just a pretty unfortunate incident for everyone involved. Unlucky for Reynolds, especially if he is going to be out for as long as they are saying, and completely ****ed for us. If Reynolds didn't get injured, and instead just got bowled over and jumped back up, there is no way it would have been a penalty. And of course we can say that the fact that he got injured warrants a penalty in itself, but players get injured all the time in this CONTACT sport without penalties being blown. Should the refs have penalised the souths player who had his arms around Lafai's leg for dangerous contact when he got injured? Of course not, because it was an unlucky occurrence, which unfortunately does happen in heavy contact sports like league. In saying all of this, I understand that the ruling was most likely 'officially' correct and within the rulings. Obviously the NRL have very concerned with player safety in more recent years and are aiming to reduce incidents like this occurring, but I feel like those in charge are completely out of touch with how many of the fans feel about the way the game is being run, particularly in regards to how it is officiated.
I do, however, share the same opinion as you regarding Graham's reaction to the penalty.
I do, however, share the same opinion as you regarding Graham's reaction to the penalty.
Last edited by a moderator: