Official Bulldogs player given 5 weeks suspension (Corey Waddell)

bradyk

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
2 x NF H2H Champ
NF Top Scorer
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
15,931
Reaction score
19,202
"No player wants to give evidence against another player. It’s an unwritten code. It's simply not necessary when you've got a number of videos and images where you can determine the seriousness of the incident."

REALLY?? Tino whinged like a girl who was only given a half a brazilian wax for her full fee. He shat on the unwritten code and smeared all over his face. And photos and videos are extremely limited because you do not get the data of how much force was placed - he literally had his hand on his face and it was light - and when Tino was bitching, he was not even in pain - he just look annoyed that he was spooked by it.
Tino wanted a penalty which is fair because 99% of players would do the same.
 

chisdog

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
8,165
Reaction score
7,811
So is he guilty of an eye gouge or head high tackle?
an unstated dangerous contact charge. It was deliberately vague to ensure suspension. We need to stamp on this now. We continually get screwed by the joke of an organisation called the NRL. Which was worse? Tino putting a headlock on Burton whilst his mate smashes his head in or Waddell's clumsy tackle? Apparently it was 10 times worse than what Tino did.
 

chisdog

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
8,165
Reaction score
7,811
"No player wants to give evidence against another player. It’s an unwritten code. It's simply not necessary when you've got a number of videos and images where you can determine the seriousness of the incident."

REALLY?? Tino whinged like a girl who was only given a half a brazilian wax for her full fee. He shat on the unwritten code and smeared all over his face. And photos and videos are extremely limited because you do not get the data of how much force was placed - he literally had his hand on his face and it was light - and when Tino was bitching, he was not even in pain - he just look annoyed that he was spooked by it.
You also have the right to face your accuser I would have thought & cross examine them. We have to appeal.
 

Caveman

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,567
Reaction score
4,411
It's waddels current form that should be keeping him out of first grade (and that is subjective) not this ridiculous ruling.

What a joke.
 

repolski

Kennel Established
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
592
Reaction score
743
You can't challenge a captains challenge as evidence by the West Tigers / Cowboy match but can you appeal and appeal sentencing?

2 weeks tops for having his hand where it shouldn't have been but 5 weeks! What a F'N joke! Compare this to similar previous offences.

Interesting to hear what Gus has to say.

Guys on NRL 360 Monday night pretty much all said he'd get off as there was nothing in it.

Tino didn't have a mark on him and nor did Tamou a few years back when Thompson copped 4 weeks for absolutely nothing!

I'm beginning to feel like Tigers supporters in thinking the NRL hierarchy and judiciary are corrupt in giving that 5 fucking weeks!

Klein should've been suspended for the rest of the year for what he did not only to the Tigers but those teams trying to get into a top 4 spot. He's made a mockery of the competition and will be sacked for how long? A lousy F'N week!
Yes if the cowboys win the comp, they will never be recognised as truly deserving premiership winners. Very sad situation all round.
 

Malla

*********
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
10,870
Reaction score
13,470
Don’t get me wrong I am happy to see Waddell make way for Topine and other young players but reading that transcript fuck me dead is this a court of law? Who do these ex players think they are with this line of questioning with zero legal background? They are not qualified to talk to or judge whether there was intent in Waddell’s actions
What a joke
 

Alan79

Kennel Legend
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
13,478
Reaction score
19,769
Can’t believe all the herpas saying this is a good thing. Is the fact one of our players has once again received a ridiculous ban totally lost on you all? Maybe it will hit home next time when it happens to a player you like.

Waddell has been decent this year. We already have RFM out. Do you all think we’ve got some superstar waiting in the rings to take his place?

Major facepalm to the reaction of the general consensus.
Yep. It suits the people here that don't appreciate Waddell. But it might be King, Vaughan, JAC, Burton etc that cops a very harsh suspension next time. Might be that a key player for an opponent plays against us for a similar incident that only cops a couple of weeks.just want fairness.
 

Snake

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 18, 2016
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
2,185
Woddles defence statements were laughable. Sounded like a teenager talking to the principle. Takes zero responsibility for what was clearly a careless tackle.
 

Natboy

Banned
Premium Member
SC H2H Champion
SC Top Scorer
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Messages
8,945
Reaction score
11,608
He’s not my favourite player but it seems the judiciary freak out every time they are faced with an alleged eye gouge.

As for Dale, how the fuck did he get suspended? That’s ridiculous and maybe just because he smashed a player from the NRL’s little darling side
 

_G-Dog_

Kennel Legend
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Messages
13,345
Reaction score
7,794
Taking the blue and white shades off he deserved somthing..

5 weeks abit excessive considering what others get and with Tino not giving "evidence" as its unclear if fingers go into eyes or hand is just over eyes..
 

flamebouyant

Kennel Legend
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
10,089
Reaction score
14,944
I know everyone loves to hate on Waddell, but this is bullshit, and we can ill afford to lose another forward. Maybe we should ask Melbourne if we can borrow NAS?! Lol
But seriously, 5 weeks? Where was Tino's testimony? Cant possibly make a player break the invisible "player code". Even if it means we ban another player for 5 weeks. I mean surely Waddells lawyer has the right to question him? Did you have blurred vision? Were there scratch marks? Were your eyes red? No they werent, because he wasnt eye gouged. Waddels hand wrapped around his face, but even with pressure, there was no eye gouge. There was no ripping action at all. Just because you apply pressure on your dick, doesnt mean your masturbating for fucks sake!!!
5 weeks is a disgrace. Tino carried on like a fucking bitch after copping his own medicine, and didnt even have to front the judiciary to give evidence due to a "players code". Who the fuck else can give evidence in this incident? Did the ref even check to see if there were scratch marks or anything? Fucking farce!
 
Last edited:
Top