For sure. It sucks that he will play hardly any footy this year.Bbo - raw talent baby.
Nasheed here,Wasn’t he going to the Tigers in a swap with Reynolds?
Nice work by the club, hopefully develops nicely in that time and gets a 4 year extension next time....
Cogger has age going for him,but really hasn't done much,for the club to re sign him,at $400k I think josh would be a good buy,but no moreGood news, i guess if we could get reynolds for $400 k cogger would more than likely not get resigned.
So i guess in the wash up do we spend $400k on reynolds.
Or do we resign cogger on argument sake say $300k.
I guess id probably take josh on for that reason.
He will be a gun in years to comeBbo - raw talent baby.
I seen he will be playing local league where he is from when the comp resumesFor sure. It sucks that he will play hardly any footy this year.
I hope we keep Cogger, he showed alot of potential imo and is far from the worst half at our club currently... wish we extended him instead of Lewis earlier in the year.Good news, i guess if we could get reynolds for $400 k cogger would more than likely not get resigned.
So i guess in the wash up do we spend $400k on reynolds.
Or do we resign cogger on argument sake say $300k.
I guess id probably take josh on for that reason.
I would have preferred that as well but can't see Cogger sticking around now.I hope we keep Cogger, he showed alot of potential imo and is far from the worst half at our club currently... wish we extended him instead of Lewis earlier in the year.
I would love to see him have a crack at 9 as we wouldnt be any worse off with what we currently have... if he stays around as reserve half ill be happy.I would have preferred that as well but can't see Cogger sticking around now.
Cogger would be playing reserve grade so I would doubt we'd even want to sign him on 300k, more like 200k. Reynolds does offer more than Cogger with the makeup of our team anyways. Again, it comes down to the price if it happens or not tho.Good news, i guess if we could get reynolds for $400 k cogger would more than likely not get resigned.
So i guess in the wash up do we spend $400k on reynolds.
Or do we resign cogger on argument sake say $300k.
I guess id probably take josh on for that reason.
Reynolds offers more versatility yes. But if Wakeham gets injured it would be nice to have a 7 in Cogger who knows how to run a side waiting in the wings. Odo from what ive seen would be better suited to 6 and just playing on instinct, the two would make a good reserve halves pairing.Cogger would be playing reserve grade so I would doubt we'd even want to sign him on 300k, more like 200k. Reynolds does offer more than Cogger with the makeup of our team anyways. Again, it comes down to the price if it happens or not tho.
Nasheed here,
This means we have rejected the Reynolds deal!!
Don't know haven't really seen Katoa yet.Also regarding Reynolds, it makes more sense for him to be our hooker/utility and back up half then coming back to play in the halves. Yeah, I hear what people are saying regarding Reynolds not being a hooker, but he's still much better then what we have and has other values that are important for a team. For the right price, which is why we haven't signed him yet, he'd be a good addition. I would of went after other targets myself and even still I'd rather Friend, but after that there's next to nothing.
eveeyone knew that McCullough has been on the outer since that Souths guy took over the coaching.This is great to sign young talent. Also like that it isn't for 4 years. 2 is good.
How did we miss Andrew Mc Cullough. The knights get another good servant. Seriously there needs to be less tunnel vision by recruitment.
Brandon Smith would be better if we're talking about players on contract. McInnes probably already on a sizeable amount at the Dragons (and I just prefer Brandon Smith, he'd be the perfect Bulldogs player).eveeyone knew that McCullough has been on the outer since that Souths guy took over the coaching.
from my recollection, the homies here occasionally name dropped him, but others said that he is good, but too Lichaa like and not worth the effort.
I'm not saying Andrew is on Lichaas level, that's a massive insult to him that could result in people coming after me, I'm just saying he's also a defensive Number 9 whos more 'solid' when our appetite is more livewire.
Cam McInnes would be our perfect hooker. Like McCullough but with a bit of zip.
a good recruitment team would be making covert and aggressive enquiries to replace the anti vaxxer next year.
Hes still young and if hes got the smarts he'll bide his time coz the opportunity will be there for him at canterbury.For sure. It sucks that he will play hardly any footy this year.