News Bellamy, Stuart and host of influential league figures will meet to review rule changes

2144superman

Kennel Legend
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Messages
10,366
Reaction score
15,460
Bellamy, Stuart and host of influential league figures will meet to review rule changes

Damien Cook as part of the committee that will meet to discuss rule changes ahead of the 2021 season. Picture: Brett Costello
Damien Cook as part of the committee that will meet to discuss rule changes ahead of the 2021 season. Picture: Brett CostelloSource: News Corp Australia


A group of the NRL’s more influential figures will meet to discuss the six-again rule and change to one referee as part of an overall review of the 2020 season.

The Sydney Morning Herald reports the NRL has formed an innovations committee made up of CEO Andrew Abdo, ARLC chair Peter V’landys, head of football Graham Annesley, Storm coach Craig Bellamy, Raiders coach Ricky Stuart, referee Matt Cecchin and star players Luke Keary and Damien Cook. The committee will be chaired by commission member Wayne Pearce.

Along with reviewing the success of this year’s changes, the team will also put forward and discuss a number of new ideas which could be introduced in 2021.

According to the Herald, the committee will get together on Monday week where they will be give statistical data from the 2020 season.

Stuart has been one of the more vocal coaches about changes to the game. He threw his support behind the six-again change after it was introduced in Round 3, revealing he was “really losing faith in the game” and was “getting annoyed” watching rugby league because of “too much mess” after the initial tackle.




NRL release 2021 schedule



Pearce is hoping the committee’s feedback and fresh ideas will help ensure the game is at its best in 2021.

“I’m asking people to come along with an open mind,” Pearce said.

“We’ll review what worked this year, what didn’t work and look at how we can make the game an even better product if we need to do anything.

“Our management team will be getting a lot of information together that we will look at on the day.

“I’m asking people to come along so we can gather some ideas, bunch them up and chat with their stakeholders.

“The idea is we go into next year looking at what worked and take that forward, as well as the things that didn’t work so well and what we need to tweak.

“I deliberately haven’t spoken to any of them about their ideas because I want them to come along with ideas that are fresh, so we’re not chatting about them and debating them beforehand. That doesn’t really serve a purpose.”

It’s expected interchange usage, concussion protocols, knock-on rulings for contests in the air, scrums, the wrestle and any tweaks that can reduce stoppages will be discussed. The new try review rule — which was trialled in dead rubber games last season — where the bunker can review a try after a referee has awarded it and while a player is preparing to convert will also be reviewed.

 

wendog33

Kennel Immortal
Premium Member
Ladder Champion
Joined
Aug 6, 2016
Messages
25,477
Reaction score
29,073
If they haven't got people from every club it's just bullshit. And it seems like a foregone conclusion that the next set of implemented rules will just be more grey areas for referees to influence games.
And, as with the 6 again and a couple of other rules the committees have brought in, the decision makers and their coaches, have a huge advantage in being prepared before the other clubs.

A rep from every club should be involved. No other way of doing it. Idiots.
 

gbrussell

Super Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Gilded
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
1,577
Reaction score
2,315
It doesn't sit well with me that any coach is on this committee. Particularly a devious coach like Bellamy. Despite his protestations most of the dodgy wrestling tackles are his invention. Bellamy and Stuart will know counters to rules they propose before they are accepted. Happy to see Cecchin there. Probably the most fair minded of the ref's. His career went downhill from the moment he CORRECTLY sin binned Cameron "the koala" Smith at Shark Park in 2017. This opened the door for the "Sutton Dynasty".
 

KambahOne

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
3,659
Reaction score
4,736
And, as with the 6 again and a couple of other rules the committees have brought in, the decision makers and their coaches, have a huge advantage in being prepared before the other clubs.

A rep from every club should be involved. No other way of doing it. Idiots.
That would accomplish nothing, literally, you would never get consensus having all 16 clubs represented. It's bad enough at board level with all clubs in that forum. Maybe a fairer selection process would be having clubs outside the top 8 or top 4 represented on the committee?
 

MoNkEy

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
4,626
The only thing worse than a Tolman hit up on the fourth, is the tackle count being restarted on the fifth.

It's rage inducing.
 

Straight18

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
2,042
Reaction score
1,152
More players in bin for all the obvious proffesional fouls in the game. Just put em in the bin straight up.
Until then the result will never be decided fair.
Any professional foul, sit em down, watch the players cut the shit out of the game then.
 

Straight18

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
May 5, 2018
Messages
2,042
Reaction score
1,152
Any professional foul in any try scoring opportunity is straight up a penalty try.
U watch the coaches clean the shit play out of the players
 

Motorhead

Kennel Enthusiast
Premium Member
2 x Tipping Champ
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
2,702
Reaction score
3,413
Bellamy should not be there.. his tactics have really been detrimental to the game.. Melbourne should have no say in rule changes
100 fucken % mate. That grubby maggot has done more to fuck our game than the rest of the coaches combined. Absolute piece of shit.
 

Alan79

Kennel Legend
Joined
Mar 10, 2007
Messages
13,438
Reaction score
19,660
That would accomplish nothing, literally, you would never get consensus having all 16 clubs represented. It's bad enough at board level with all clubs in that forum. Maybe a fairer selection process would be having clubs outside the top 8 or top 4 represented on the committee?
If this group isn't able to run a civilized meeting between reps from every club there should be none there and the NRL suggests changes and send them to the clubs to discuss. As I understand it, whatever changes eventuate won't be down to a vote by the members there, it'll just be a platform for them to suggest changes which the NRL's governing body will either veto or implement.
 
Top