- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 8,391
- Reaction score
- 2,717
So everyone knows
Jordan McLean's actions in Alex McKinnon tackle were not 'significant' cause of injury, panel decides
Melbourne forward Jordan McLean had an additional four matches added to his suspension for the tackle that left Alex McKinnon with spinal damage because the NRL judiciary panel considered his actions were not a "significant" cause of the injury sustained by the Newcastle forward.
McLean was found guilty of a grade two dangerous throw, which carries a base penalty of 325 demerit points, but he received a seven match ban at Wednesday night's judiciary hearing after the panel deemed the 22-year-old should receive an additional 400 demerit points for the injury suffered by McKinnon.
The revelation that McLean's suspension was increased to take into account the injury has prompted criticism from some who believe that judiciary offences should be judged solely on their merit, but it is common for the match review committee to grade an offence higher if an opposition player was badly hurt.
In fact, Fairfax Media has learnt that McLean received only an extra four game ban for a tackle that resulted in McKinnon fracturing his C4 and C5 vertebrae and damaging his spinal cord because the judiciary panel of Mal Cochrane, Bob Lindner and Chris McKenna felt his role in causing the injury was "right down the very end of the scale".
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...e-of-injury-panel-decides-20140403-zqq9u.html
So who were they blaming for the injury, if the player who tackled him wasn't the 'significant' cause of the injury
The injury is the outcome of many factors Kaz. You can't single out one exact thing as THE cause of it. But at the end of the day McLean lifted the legs, put Alex in a dangerous position and that is illegal. How you can say it wasn't illegal, even after the fact he was charged by the judiciary over it (ignoring the additional weeks, that is irrelevant), you still think it was legal.
Absolutely boggles my mind how you can have that opinion.