You’re not a doggies fan if you don’t feel off when a youngster is let go.
It is disappointing when local juniors don't work out, particularly if they have shown some promise across the years.
In Alamoti's case, I think the product never quite matched the packaging (at least yet):
* He was offered a full-time contract (on potential alone, not performance) several years too early - something that had to be done to stave off competition;
* He was promoted to start in the NRL (on potential alone, not performance) several years too early;
* He is the "victim" of developing physically at a young age, being able to dominate peers in those grades, but then struggling to adapt to open age - he is still so young, he might very well still make it, but it might not be quite as easy as he was used to;
* His emergence occurred during the "unspecified virus of unknown origin", and like many other rookies, have had their progress retarded by its impacts;
Of major concern (to me) was just how slow he appeared after making several breaks throughout the year - easily the slowest of our backline, probably in both NRL & Reggies. (Maybe EQW would give him a run for slowest).
And equally, his defence was suspect and became worse as the season progressed; but then, that was not a problem isolated to him. So, perhaps a little unfair to lay that all on him.
I think the Panthers move is a good one. If he is ever going to make it, he needs further development, and in an environment that isn't sending players backwards.
We can't use him right now (maybe the Panthers can).
If he can improve and get himself up to NRL standard, then maybe in a year or two he will be ready, and maybe at that time our club could be in a position to consider getting him back...maybe.