Has Thompson definitely signed elsewhere?
Burton is the best 6 at the club.. end of storyBest two centres at the club are Crichton and Burton. Problem is both being paid fullback & 5/8 money.
I would suggest both players have the talent to be the best in a couple of positions at the club, that's not the the sole determining factor in what position they will be picked.Best two centres at the club are Crichton and Burton. Problem is both being paid fullback & 5/8 money.
mate good fullback money is over 1 millionBest two centres at the club are Crichton and Burton. Problem is both being paid fullback & 5/8 money.
My view is Crichton is one of the best centres in the game and should be played in the centres. I do believe he is locked in to start the season in the No.1 though.I’m also concerned with Taaffe.
I think he’s got a good little attacking game and can add value, but a lot of my mates are Souths fans, and being totally transparent, they said watching games they liked him and wished they kept him as back up, but the amount of times he got picked up and forced back for a drop out, or just totally manhandled coming off the line is a real… real concern. We can’t be going into the season pinning our hopes on him being out solid FB option.
Both easily on more than 800k.mate good fullback money is over 1 million
Neither of these players are over 800k
we are fine.
I agree.. I think we signed taaffe as an insurance policy if chricton doesn't work out at fullback. I can't see chricton lasting more than 8 games at the back before he's switched.. he won't get switched while we are winning.. and the change could come too late when the seasons already gone (bit like what happened with perham this year). Or he'll go way better than we expected/hoped and we'll only see taaffe in reserve grade or backing up during origin periodsMy view is Crichton is one of the best centres in the game and should be played in the centres. I do believe he is locked in to start the season in the No.1 though.
I think the plan in signing Taaffe was an unknown. I don’t see him starting at fullback. I would have thought 14 until we signed 45 other utility’s after him.
I really would like to see him given a shot in the halves. Even if that is in Reggies to start the season. Sexton was a step up from what we had when he arrived but I don’t know about him as a long term option.
Not bad. Main anomaly for me is starting Sutton in FR. just gets put on his back too much to start & take play 1 carriers. With what we currently have it’s likely to be either Poasa or L Knight starting over him.1. Crichton
2. Addo-Carr
3. Xerri
4. Kiraz
5. Wilson
6. Burton
7. Sexton
8. Sutton
9. Mahoney
10. King (c)
11. Kikau
12. Preston
13. Curran
14. Mann
15. Takeijau
16. Faasumlli
17. Knight
Hutchison has no pace. One of the slowest movers in the league1. Critta (we need to see if he can be our elite FB first up. We can't miss out on what he "could" bring to that roving role and worth the experiment)
2. Fox (needs to be told to focus more on his footy)
3. Xerri (looks like a great signing at this stage).
4. Hutchison (if he has a bit of speed but he can def get it to Xerri)
5. Kiraz (wing is his best spot bringing it back and catching the high kicks)
6. Burton (Hutchison if Burto doesn't adequately take on the responsibilities of feeding Kiks and his outside backs and improve his short kicking game)
7. Taafe (like to see these 2 paired again. Has the confidence to get repeat sets and is very busy and is the effort player we need)
8. SST
9. Mahoney
10. Knight (better to start with him rather than King)
11. Kikau
12. Preston
13. Curran
14. Skelton (we need to develop this guys obvious potential with forward and backs training and let him loose) Contract year and he "could" be anything.
15. Salmon (spells Reed if necessary and our utility)
16. King (needs his passing game back)
17. Poasa (give him a few games and see how he goes. If too docile replace with a goer)
Taafe was a rep 7 with Burton 6 in junior reps.Hutchison has no pace. One of the slowest movers in the league
Tafe is not a halfback
You wont get value if you play him at fullback because he isn't a good fullback. He couldn't even look good at fullback when playing for Penrith. He would make a massive impact for us at centre because he doesn't need a half to make him look good when he plays centre. Also he's the best defensive centre in the game & would improve us defensively. Would form one of the best right edge combos in the NRL with Preston-Crichton-Kiraz.You could say a bottom team, wooden spoon potential, signing a top 2 centre playing for the best team in the competition (to play centre) is a mistake tho. How much impact is Crichton going to have at centre here in our team. Then you have to factor in his salary. With all this considered I don't see how we can play him anywhere else bar fullback if you're looking for value in the salary cap.
I'd still play them both at centre. We can have 2 of the best edge combos in the NRL.Best two centres at the club are Crichton and Burton. Problem is both being paid fullback & 5/8 money.
No he isn't.Burton is the best 6 at the club.. end of story
Okay so who is the best 6 at the club then?No he isn't.
Hutchinson would play better at 6 than Burton did this season. At least he is a busy player who would run at the opposition. Burton doesn't even try most games. Burton at centre would be better value for us.Okay so who is the best 6 at the club then?