It included both primary school and high school students.
As for the 'virus deciding you are no longer a kid', I'm not entirely sure what your question is. It seems well established the virus is fatal for the elderly and people with existing immune and respiratory conditions. Whereas the virus appears (largely) to not affect children.
I would assume that children having only been alive for <18 years have not yet developed any bad illnesses and diseases and are generally healthy human beings and therefore less likely to experience any of the more serious symptoms of the Chinese virus.
However the study also seems to suggest that the transmission to/from children is also far less than amongst adults. It would lend
It included both primary school and high school students.
As for the 'virus deciding you are no longer a kid', I'm not entirely sure what your question is. It seems well established the virus is fatal for the elderly and people with existing immune and respiratory conditions. Whereas the virus appears (largely) to not affect children.
I would assume that children having only been alive for <18 years have not yet developed any bad illnesses and diseases and are generally healthy human beings and therefore less likely to experience any of the more serious symptoms of the Chinese virus.
However the study also seems to suggest that the transmission to/from children is also far less than amongst adults. It would lend weight to opening schools immediately and having all students back at both primary and high schools.
You can read the results of the study here:
http://ncirs.org.au/sites/default/files/2020-04/NCIRS NSW Schools COVID_Summary_FINAL public_26 April 2020.pdf
weight to opening schools immediately and having all students back at both primary and high schools.
You can read the results of the study here:
http://ncirs.org.au/sites/default/files/2020-04/NCIRS NSW Schools COVID_Summary_FINAL public_26 April 2020.pdf