His position at the Roosters was already untenable before the 800k offer was a thing. They also removed it almost instantly. If we offered Latrell 900k-1m (people are saying it was less) it was competing with the 650k offer at the time. If the Tigers have come in with a 1.3m (dumb offer, overs on overs) then he's going there. This whole situation has been a seesaw so hopefully it can swing back in our favour and we can sign him for 900k-1m. It seems very unlikely tho.So ur say8mg he accepted same money from us as Chooks offered to leave and come to us for same money?
It doesn't have to be rocket science you tool. Have you considered that Latrell isn't getting along with the playing group at the Roosters OR the admin and that this has been brewing for a while. He has an opportunity to remain or he did with the Roosters and probably win more premierships and at the very least play semi-final football year in year out BUT he has chosen to "test the market" and likely sign for around the same coin elsewhere.Well considering he said chooks offer of 800k wasn’t enough
Why would you think he would leave and sign with us for same money.......?
Not rocket science....
He ain’t guna tap 1.3 on the head to come to us for same as chooks offered himHis position at the Roosters was already untenable before the 800k offer was a thing. They also removed it almost instantly. If we offered Latrell 900k-1m (people are saying it was less) it was competing with the 650k offer at the time. If the Tigers have come in with a 1.3m (dumb offer, overs on overs) then he's going there. This whole situation has been a seesaw so hopefully it can swing back in our favour and we can sign him for 900k-1m. It seems very unlikely tho.
He will 100% take the 1.3m if it's offered at the Tigers. If we offer 900k-1m it's more then what the Roosters are offering. I also think the Roosters are less likely to re-offer the 800k, more closer to their first 650k offer. I don't see him staying at the Roosters regardless.He ain’t guna tap 1.3 on the head to come to us for same as chooks offered him
Hahaha holy shitIt doesn't have to be rocket science you tool. Have you considered that Latrell isn't getting along with the playing group at the Roosters OR the admin and that this has been brewing for a while. He has an opportunity to remain or he did with the Roosters and probably win more premierships and at the very least play semi-final football year in year out BUT he has chosen to "test the market" and likely sign for around the same coin elsewhere.
So you agree with my original post regarding money and where he will sign ?He will 100% take the 1.3m if it's offered at the Tigers. If we offer 900k-1m it's more then what the Roosters are offering. I also think the Roosters are less likely to re-offer the 800k, more closer to their first 650k offer. I don't see him staying at the Roosters regardless.
I wouldn't pay 1.3m for him, I'd be comfortable offering 900k-1m. I think he will sign with the Tigers IF they're offering 1.3m. I'm not sure what your origin post was I hope that answers your question tho.So you agree with my original post regarding money and where he will sign ?
@coachHis position at the Roosters was already untenable before the 800k offer was a thing. They also removed it almost instantly. If we offered Latrell 900k-1m (people are saying it was less) it was competing with the 650k offer at the time.
You're an idiot. He has dramas with players and the best example of that is that NOT ONE player, admin or coaching staff have come out and defended Latrell publicly. Not one. Not even on their social media accounts to say they hope he is ok with all that is unfolding. That has to tell you something and raise red flags.Hahaha holy shit
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve read
He has no dramas with players
His drama is money, and we sweet fa supposedly said he agreed in principle to sign for same money chooks offered
1. Crap
2. Where’s his evidence
3. Tigers offered 1.3 as of beginning of November
Tigers have never stated the amount in question.. they have never stated $1.3 mill. it's all again "media" hype.I wouldn't pay 1.3m for him, I'd be comfortable offering 900k-1m. I think he will sign with the Tigers IF they're offering 1.3m. I'm not sure what your origin post was I hope that answers your question tho.
Are you serious....@coach
You're an idiot. He has dramas with players and the best example of that is that NOT ONE player, admin or coaching staff have come out and defended Latrell publicly. Not one. Not even on their social media accounts to say they hope he is ok with all that is unfolding. That has to tell you something and raise red flags.
Coach , You’re a pelican!Bullshit
Chooks offered 800k to stay and he thought that was no where near enough
Your trying to say he accepted 800-900k in principle from us
Leave for same money
Fuck you talk shit
Absolute garbage
They offered him 800k extensionCoach , You’re a pelican!
The Roosters offer via Robinson only came after they got wind of the Bulldogs negotiations (Coorey) we’re concrete ie Mitchell was called in to confirm this hence the semantics that came from the Roosters via their media allies.
Your stupidity exceeds your ignorance, good sir
It’s YOU are a donkeyThey offered him 800k extension
He turned it down because he wanted more money
Yet you think he was a done deal and dogs thru principle for same money
Why do you think he went to tigers for 1.3... more money
Fuck your a donkey
You're stupid. You really are.Are you serious....
So you think he was guna sign with us for same money chooks offered?
And When the tigers throwing around 1.3
Pull ya head in muppet
500k extra a season
Hahhahhahahhhahahhahaha
Wait .. hold on. We had a deal agreed in principle for 800-900k with Mitchell? Really? Not debating it's validity, just never had seen that number before as always seemed to be reporting it as a Milliion dollar deal.Not a chance-
The negotiations with Coorey were $800k-$900k agreed in principle before the “committee “shit their collective bed
That esculated quickly ...You're stupid. You really are.
Don’t talk sense mateThat esculated quickly ...
Whether Mitchell was offered the same amount as us before or after we offered them is irrelevant imo though I haven't seen any actual info saying that he was.
He's just won the premiership, flying at the Roosters though obviously can still improve. He's in a position where he can stay where he is in a killer team that's going to be fighting for the premiership every year for decades .... and he also has an offer with a rival club for the EXACT same money as the Rorters are offering (not important if they offered it later or before). This rival club is rebuilding. Outside the top 8. Years off being close to challenging for the top 4 let alone the premiership. Has a rookie coach. Lacks top top talent. But he'd go to this club for the same money?
Wasn't everyone talking about having to offer 200k more than any other club but we're apparently in a position to get him on the same money as the Rorters? Ah, because he wasn't happy at the Rorters anymore. Wanted out because the playing group / admin weren't treating him right. But they were happy to put out that they offered 800-900k to him? To save face right? Maybe ... seems a weird step to take though.
I haven't seen any article seeing that we've been offering him lower than a mill. I've seen indirect comments about the Dogs not wanting to offer over a mill and talking about Mitchell asking too much. Now if we had an offer accepted, why would these artiles come out?
Now, if you say they're bullshit articles then all the information that's being fed to us is bullshit. The reality is that we don't know anything. Why make it out that we do?
To me, that suggests more that "players/the team" have issues with HIM/his attitude/opinion of self, not the other way around...@coach
You're an idiot. He has dramas with players and the best example of that is that NOT ONE player, admin or coaching staff have come out and defended Latrell publicly. Not one. Not even on their social media accounts to say they hope he is ok with all that is unfolding. That has to tell you something and raise red flags.