Ripley
Kennel Established
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2020
- Messages
- 509
- Reaction score
- 953
I really can’t either. I can only assume one party asked for an option and then the other in an act of tit for tat said “OK, well I want one too!”I’m not sure under what circumstances a player and a club would agree to an “either” option.
But here’s the thing, no matter how strange and unusual, at least it’s binding. Harry or The Storm decide to exercise the option, the other party is bound to it, legally, having signed the stupid thing in the first place.
Under your “NRL contracts definition” nobody is bound to anything. Harry or The Storm decide to exercise their option, the other party says “no” or “pineapple”, nobody is bound to anything, nobody has redress to anything.
It is the very definition of not being worth the paper it is written on.
Maybe you can ask The Law Society what the fuck it’s supposed to achieve because I’m sure any Judge who was asked to rule on it would be asking.
He could rule in favour of the pineapple for all the sense it would make.
Last edited: