Great idea, let's play Thomson in reserve grade.1.JAC
2.Okenbor
3.cotric
4.hoppa
5.DWZ
6.averilo
7.marshall
8.Ogden
9.Wakeham
10.Napa
11.jackson
12.rfm
13.elliot
14.Jmk
15.hetherington
16.waddell
17.stimson
I agree we will have to pay overs for top class players. However doing that for a winger who wants to play a position he hasn't played at NRL, well to me that's not a good recruiting strategy. DWZ mark 2.We have to pay overs otherwise no one good will come which = fullback money anyways. Even if we were buying JAC as a winger (we can use someone else like Nofoaluma as an e.g.) it'd be fullback money.
the difference is JAC is the faster player in the comp, in the top 3 wingers in the game if not the best imo.I agree we will have to pay overs for top class players. However doing that for a winger who wants to play a position he hasn't played at NRL, well to me that's not a good recruiting strategy. DWZ mark 2.
It isn't and we want to address the spine if players are available there, especially hooker. When recruitment was open since last November and we got very little done this is the outcome unfortunately, I don't want next year to be a write off like this one. I think JAC is more likely to succeed at fullback than DWZ ever was. He should get his move next year regardless if it's us or another club so we'll see I guess.I agree we will have to pay overs for top class players. However doing that for a winger who wants to play a position he hasn't played at NRL, well to me that's not a good recruiting strategy. DWZ mark 2.
Pay him top grade winger money and if he makes the transitions then he can talkregardless who started thread I like the idea of paying jac fback money, I've watched plenty of him and I think he's got good enough ball skills, he's pretty robust for defence, shitload speed. He wants to play with the brothers but they can't pay fb money
Not as a winger. I'd say closer to 500k. An extra 100k isn't bad in my books considering everything.Surely he will take 600k with a clause for upgrade if he succeeds as a FB... If he doesn't the real question lies on whether he is worth 600k as a winger?
Who is the best winger in the comp? Carr would go close, so would Cotric and if 200k extra over valuation gets you Cotric and JAC then i find it hard to find a negative in that kind of business.Not as a winger. I'd say closer to 500k. An extra 100k isn't bad in my books considering everything.
fair point this actually. Guess the concern though is that if it doesn't work out, we've already got a heap of wingers at the club. Would be good to see one of DWZ or Reimis leave this summer.Who is the best winger in the comp? Carr would go close, so would Cotric and if 200k extra over valuation gets you Cotric and JAC then i find it hard to find a negative in that kind of business.
Basically locking in two of the best wingers in the comp who can potentially play anywhere in your back 5 including FB. I give it the go ahead.
We'll if they can sort out a deal its very likely youll see it..fair point this actually. Guess the concern though is that if it doesn't work out, we've already got a heap of wingers at the club. Would be good to see one of DWZ or Reimis leave this summer.
Nasheeds OilWhose mail is good then? Didn't realise there was a whole hierachy of the best IDKs on here
No player agent would ever let their client agree to that.Assuming this is true
I would sign JAC as a fullback, if he fails the contract reverts back to an agreed reasonable winger's money.
That would be fair to both parties.
Otherwise it's a BIG NO for me !