Ok reading over that I didn't like several things,
Dylan Walker: Ok I actually do agree with this one.
Shane Flanagan: He should be banned and that should be it. I actually thought he should have been banned for life already over the peptides issue and mainly due to a failure of duty of care. Case by case leaves it open to personal opinion and we all know what Greenturd is like. So Flanagan will be back mark my word. "The proposed fine of $800,000 on the Sharks for continuing to engage with Flanagan during the period he was banned has been reduced to $500,000 after the club acknowledged and accepted its wrongdoing." So the club intentionally does it knowing it's wrong, get's caught and forcibly says sorry to reduce the penalty and the NRL go ok, take 300k off. Seriously WTF???
SHARKS SALARY CAP: So first of all, sharks yet again! Peptides, Flanagan, Salary Cap breaches. If anything they should have been made a bigger example of. Possibly even removed from the game. So they intentionally yet again deliberately cheat every single year to win a GF and do so but apparently they were ok for the year they actually did win it and then went back over again?? Let's call a spade a spade here, Storm lost premierships and so should the Sharks...their only one. Then they reduce it and allow them to spread the Salary Cap reduction over 2 seasons to further help them out. Plus reduce the breach notice yet again! Fukin hell Greenturd are you that stupid to think that WE are that stupid or does your arrogance infect you that much that you think that we won't see the truth? Or do you just not give a fuk??
So here's a strategy. Sign heaps of players over
West Tigers: They said sorry so all good? Who gives a fuk, next.
Dylan Napa: I still think the Dogs should take the NRL to court but hey.
Scott Bolton: So he gets a half sentence by being forced to humiliate himself in front of every other club and player???
De belin: No choice but to stand the man bun poof down.
* Special mention to the 11 year part of the rule though. Can easily see an issue here with future cases that are bad yet don't make the magic 11year mark and be exploited.
So it must be said, where the fuk is the sanctions for Burgess and Inglis in all of this BS? Both caused just as much or is more serious then say what Napa did (which wasn't illegal).
Can't say I'm overly impressed over the forced rules and sanctions introduced here tbh.