Mr Invisible
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 47
I don't ... I got blocked long ago for constantly posting the picture of him and the lingerie waitress together and asking "Hows your wife Phil".I wouldn't say he's being positive. He's having a dig at the dogs for letting the old board go with that comment. Why anyone follows him on twitter is beyond me.
[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]I don't ... I got blocked long ago for constantly posting the picture of him and the lingerie waitress together and asking "Hows your wife Phil".
Exactly.andrew hill was appointed by the current board when they didnt fire him
That’s rothfield being a ****.
Mr I for every positive post this **** does it out weighs the fact he will do another 283838383 negative posts. He would sell his left but to report a story
Fucking right.andrew hill was appointed by the current board when they didnt fire him
Raelene and 69 should NEVER be used in the same sentence.When I hear “CEO” and “Bulldogs” in a sentence together, i rewind back to Raelene and think “if there was a worse administrator in our club, times it by 69 and that’s how bad she was”
Yeah you can..Raelene and 69 should NEVER be used in the same sentence.
Yeah, it's something of a backhanded compliment.I wouldn't say he's being positive. He's having a dig at the dogs for letting the old board go with that comment. Why anyone follows him on twitter is beyond me.
Well they both have no / little hair so there's another thing they have in common.Yeah you can..
When Greenburg and Castle are in the same sentence. Perfect for each other, love screwing over others
Why 69When I hear “CEO” and “Bulldogs” in a sentence together, i rewind back to Raelene and think “if there was a worse administrator in our club, times it by 69 and that’s how bad she was”
LolRaelene and 69 should NEVER be used in the same sentence.