nice packs dont win comps, every pack needs a mongrel i agree i never liked the guy, but then again i never liked a c--t that played for the chooksAs it stands crocker is a better player, he brings more to a team and he would add some mongrel in the backrow which the dogs don't really have as it stands, but he would be on a short contract, 1-2 years whereas eastwood would probably sign on longer.
if i had to choose it would be crocker.
Eastwood is good and better for the future but we need help now. Crocker would improve our team soooooo much. He could also toughen up the rest of our pack. Players like Hickey, Harrison and Kite could learn alot from him.
Yeah I know they have signed, guess that is now 3 they were after and didn't get.mannering has signed with warriors already as has patterson with knights. lets hope crocker comes to dogs we need a strong second rower coz last game we lacked it!