Big Nick
Kennel Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 25, 2010
- Messages
- 1,097
- Reaction score
- 6
Hmm... I wonder if this is true. It sounds a bit like blackmail, which to my knowledge is still illegal.NRL draws line in the sand
The quiet word out of Belmore in the wake of ‘Bad Friday’ is that the club was told by the NRL it would not be a good idea to fight the charges against the four Bulldogs players from the judiciary.
That so slack on a team it isn't even funny.Nice. The NRL threatening the Bulldogs to not exercise their legal right to fight the charges.
If he is such a bad trainer according to Bennett how did he bulk up so much in 2-3 years lol?Apparantely hes out of favour with bennett cause hes a bad trainer ,couldn't imagine des liking that
This proves the nrl are so protective of there golden child it's not funny. Total ****wits they areThe Lurker has your mid-week dose of gossip and rumours including the Bulldogs hunting a Bronco, line in the sand from the NRL and Panthers players on notice.
MORE: Live Coverage - Benji Marshall and Josh Dugan press-conference | Bulldog’s Bite – How rugby league got its mojo back | Things that made you go WTF - NRL Round 5 | 2015 Dally M Leaderboard
Vidot to the Dogs?
Out of favour Broncos winger Daniel Vidot could join the injury-hit Bulldogs before the June 30 transfer deadline.
Big and strong, Vidot is an ideal Des Hasler player but hasn’t won over Wayne Bennett at the Broncos because of his laid-back attitude to training.
The former Raider and Dragon has struggled to get a game at the Broncos in the early rounds, although he has been selected again this week, and the Broncos may be prepared to release him if the clubs can come to an arrangement.
Bennett has plenty of outside backs at his disposal and Vidot started the year at prop in the Queensland Cup - a clear sign that he is offside with those that matter at the Broncos.
NRL draws line in the sand
The quiet word out of Belmore in the wake of ‘Bad Friday’ is that the club was told by the NRL it would not be a good idea to fight the charges against the four Bulldogs players from the judiciary.
The NRL has finally drawn a line in the sand over escalating abuse of match officials - and the ugly bottle throwing incident after the loss to Souths proved the final straw.
The NRL no longer wants to debate the issue and wanted no part of a heated judiciary hearing against angry Dogs David Klemmer and James Graham - hence the warning that a challenge would not have a good outcome for the club.
The Dogs have reluctantly taken their medicine in a fight they could not win - and will be severely depleted for the next few weeks as a result.
A few weeks back there was talk on here about us getting him, many of us including myself instantly said no to the idea,Yes to Vidot.
He'd be pretty handy this week to be honest. Push Rona into the centres and Vidot onto the Wing.
Maybe the same way the sharks didWouldn't mind Vidot guy is big and strong lol
That so slack on a team it isn't even funny.
If he is such a bad trainer according to Bennett how did he bulk up so much in 2-3 years lol?
He's not wearing a blue and white jersey.Can someone ask somebody what is the reason behind not charging Nathan Peats when he intimidated the ref asking a question over a dud call using the F word?
Someone needs to ring and ask ray hadley the fukwitCan someone ask somebody what is the reason behind not charging Nathan Peats when he intimidated the ref asking a question over a dud call using the F word?
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has a court conveniently located in Sydney.. wish we took that option to expose those f*cks at the NRLI would have sued the NRL.
The quite answer out of Belmore should have been "**** off", not "yes sir"The quiet word out of Belmore in the wake of ‘Bad Friday’ is that the club was told by the NRL it would not be a good idea to fight the charges against the four Bulldogs players from the judiciary.