Ask and you shall be given.
If you don't feel like ploughing through the whole thing, read the executive summary. Hur outlines the considerable evidence that Biden committed a crime, and then explains why he decided not to prosecute anyway. He felt that:
i) he could not prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt.
ii) Biden's age and apparent senility would make him a sympathetic figure.
iii) Previous presidents and vice-presidents have regularly done the same thing. By custom, if not by law, you just don't do that sort of thing to a president - unless his name is Trump!
iv) Biden might not have done it - it might have been one of his staffers!
The evidence that Hur himself uncovered gives the lie to much of the above. He had audio evidence of Biden admitting his crime to his ghost writer. Also, some of the classified information was Biden's own notes, which he insisted (wrongly) were his own property, to do with as he liked. Hur did the first part of his job very well, but squibbed the second part, probably because he knew which side his bread was buttered.
.