The Aerosexual Thread

Chris Harding

Steam Powered Dog
Premium Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
11,174
Reaction score
11,773
I hate it when they do maintenance and put the wings back on upside down :-).
But you get a great view out every window, and you can see that the wheels are down when you begin a landing.

Flew on one of these out to Longreach. Good planes for short flights. Leg room is a bit tight.
 

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,012
Reaction score
42,492
But you get a great view out every window, and you can see that the wheels are down when you begin a landing.

Flew on one of these out to Longreach. Good planes for short flights. Leg room is a bit tight.
Low wing profile, the B727 was the same, hence both have high mounted engines. The weird thing about this one is view blocking and noise right in the centre of the cabin, I’m not surprised it wasn’t a better seller.
 

DinkumDog

Kennel Immortal
2 x Gilded
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
23,012
Reaction score
42,492
View attachment 37127

I regularly flew Sydney to Melbourne in Ansett 727’s, under an hour wheels up to wheels down was not unusual. They cruised at up to 960 kph and got to “cruising altitude” very fast. Being regulars we always had seats up the front, but I still remember once a meeting was late finishing and we had to catch a later flight. Sitting down the back was not pleasant, it was hellishly noisy.

Always a Bulldog
MD (mainly) persisted with high mounted engine designs. The MD-80 family I flew on several times (US Domestic) and of course the MD-95 became the B717, so in Australia what was Impulse (folded into QantasLink, both brands sponsoring the Knights at one stage). Very noisy in the back third of the cabin. I’m not surprised we don’t see many high mounted engine designs today - even with quieter engine tech - they’re just too noisy. Maybe future all electric aircraft will change that in the short haul market.
 
Top