NRL chief David Gallop says the McIntyre finals system will remain

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shanked

U been Shanked
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
11,566
Reaction score
2,622
NRL chief David Gallop says the McIntyre finals system will remain


September 29, 2009

NRL chief executive David Gallop says the competition's controversial McIntyre finals system is here to stay.

Critics of the system have been out in force during the finals series, as Parramatta came from eighth position on the ladder to qualify for Sunday's grand final against a Melbourne team who finished fourth following the home-and-away rounds.

Most of the anti-McIntyre arguments this season have surrounded the exits of Manly and St George Illawarra.

Defending premiers Manly had to wait two days before learning of their exit in the first week of finals, losing to the Storm in a Friday night match and only being knocked out when the Eels upset the Dragons that Sunday.

The minor premier Dragons then had to travel to Brisbane in week two despite finishing five places higher than the Broncos on the ladder, going down 24-10 to have their season ended.

That led many to suggest the NRL adopt the AFL's finals system, but Gallop said no such move was being considered.

"A lot gets debated every year about the McIntyre system but we're pleased about what it's produced," he said.

"It's a system that is the right one, we believe, for rugby league with the mid-season impact of rep footy.

"One playing eight and two playing seven makes sense to us.

"If you're good enough from seventh or eighth and you keep winning then you can get through to the grand final and that's what we've seen with Parramatta.

"We're pretty pleased with how it's turned out."

Gallop says teams making a late-season charge towards the grand final, such as the Eels this year and the Wests Tigers in seasons before them, should be applauded and deserved due reward.

"These days clubs are very conscious of the fact they need to be firing in September," he said.

"That's part of rugby league these days, getting through the attrition of a long season and peaking at the right time."

Gallop said this year's finals series had been a success for the game after an at-times troubled year on the field, culminating in last Friday's blockbuster preliminary final in front of a full house at ANZ Stadium between the Eels and Bulldogs.

"Obviously Friday night was a special night for the game," he said.

"To have 75,000 fans here, two big traditional Sydney clubs playing off for the one spot, was very important for us."

Gallop also said the two-referee system, which will be used for the first time at Sunday's grand final, had been a success in its inaugural season.

"The speed of the ruck, the speed of the game generally, the opportunity for the smaller guys to make an impact on the game has been what's made the footy on the field so exciting in 2009," he said.

"Our two-referee system has been a large part of that improvement."
 

B.A.Baracus

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
1
Go F*ck yourself David Gallop you idiot.

Only 16 teams, half of them make the qualifying finals. It is a disgrace, rewarding teams for being sh1te.
 

morgandogs

ARMIT LOVE
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
0
How it worked

Week One
Elimination Final: 4th vs 5th
Qualification Final: 2nd vs 3rd
Bye: 1st
Week Two
Minor Semi Final: Winners of Elimination Final vs Losers of Qualification Final
Major Semi Final: 1st vs Winners of Qualification Final
Week Three
Preliminary Final: Winners of Minor Semi Final vs Losers of Major Semi Final
Bye: Winners of Major Semi Final.
Week Four
Grand Final: Winners of Major Semi Final vs Winners of Preliminary Final
 

nasals

Kennel Participant
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
301
Reaction score
0
Not sure what everyone is complaining about. It's almost as though people believe that if you finish 7th or 8th you are not entitled to beat 1st or 2nd.

I think it's fair if you consider the finals as a separate competition.

Melbourne have admitted that they tried to time their run into the finals so they would be at their peak and that's exactly how it's turned out.

The only thing they should look at is the venue's for some of the finals.

Week 1 should be home ground advantage to the highest placed teams but after that every finals game should be played in Sydney.
 

S4Sonny

Ooh Ahh Cantona
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
12,874
Reaction score
162
We should use the Sonny Finals System.

Week 1: Dogs Vs. Bye (This should be a close match)

Week 2: Dogs Vs. Bye (We'll smash them)

Week 3: Dogs Vs. Bye (Very close match, goal kicking gotta be spot on)

Grand Final: Dogs Vs. Bye (Tight match, every point counts)
 

afghan4life

Beastwood
Joined
May 17, 2008
Messages
1,817
Reaction score
0
we should use the sonny finals system.

Week 1: Dogs vs. Bye (this should be a close match)

week 2: Dogs vs. Bye (we'll smash them)

week 3: Dogs vs. Bye (very close match, goal kicking gotta be spot on)

grand final: Dogs vs. Bye (tight match, every point counts)
dry
 

Bakes

The REAL Bakes
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
13,982
Reaction score
486
He is just not open to new ideas.
They wont change it because they make so much money this way, even if it does let teams that are sh*t house for half the season make the GF
 

Number13

Management
Joined
Feb 29, 2004
Messages
2,360
Reaction score
124
He is just not open to new ideas.
They wont change it because they make so much money this way, even if it does let teams that are sh*t house for half the season make the GF
Excellent post Bakes.

Spot on mate.
 

B.A.Baracus

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
1
This is bad enough, in England they have taken the circus to a whole new level. The team that finishes top gets to CHOOSE who from the top 8 they wish to play in the qualifying final.
 

B.A.Baracus

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
1
Not sure what everyone is complaining about. It's almost as though people believe that if you finish 7th or 8th you are not entitled to beat 1st or 2nd.
Absolutely. Why reward mediocrity? Makes our game farcical
I think it's fair if you consider the finals as a separate competition.
Ok, then if you finish top, you are Champions. You should be rewarded for being the best over the course of the season. This would ensure top quality footy week in, week out. Get another sponsor for this "separate competition" and call it something else.

Melbourne have admitted that they tried to time their run into the finals so they would be at their peak and that's exactly how it's turned out.
So, we the fans get ripped off watching poor footy before they hit their supposed "peak". Should we, the fans also only turn up for the finals?
 

Shawty

Kennel Established
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
811
Reaction score
1
I dont mind either systems. whatever teams wants it most will win the gf
 

Mr. Sparkle

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Feb 10, 2007
Messages
1,347
Reaction score
1
They should at least change the home ground advantage for week 2 of the finals. This year's final showed the flawed system with;

Parra (8) vs Titans (3) in Sydney
Broncos (6) vs Dragons (1) at Suncorp.

The higher ranked teams such as the Dragons & Titans should of gotten the home ground advantage instead.
 

Tha DoggFather

Banned
In the Sin Bin
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
6,043
Reaction score
63
Comes down to money, if it goes back to a top 5, fans of teams 6-16 wont support or be interested in the JRL
 
S

Snake Jailbird

Guest
They should at least change the home ground advantage for week 2 of the finals. This year's final showed the flawed system with;

Parra (8) vs Titans (3) in Sydney
Broncos (6) vs Dragons (1) at Suncorp.

The higher ranked teams such as the Dragons & Titans should of gotten the home ground advantage instead.
Why? Because they lost, when playing at home, with their home ground advantage against a team which didn't do as good as them all year?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top