Wahesh
The Forefather of The Kennel
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2007
- Messages
- 24,866
- Reaction score
- 12,209
Oh you want my argument? Here it is then.Clap clap!
You put forth a very compelling argument to back up your random claim there.
NRL To probe Greenberg over cover up claims;
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...tigator-to-quiz-greenberg-20130902-2t15d.html
Paul Kent has a big question mark over Greenberg
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...n/news-story/dd9855081bf98d076c259c25cb17e92c
Todd Greenberg in hot water over cover ups
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...r/news-story/0623324b4f87f761b2fe914e2bc87846
Greenberg is shifty, he was shifty for us, but shifty no less. its in his DNA.
Greenberg did what he did because IT WAS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CLUB.
What would you have him do, completely admit that there was something going on?
You're smart Nasheed, you know what would've happened. The media would've jumped on that story like flies on shit, and then what would've happened to us? Sponsors drop us, hard time attracting good players, difficulty finding a more sponsors - stuff that would've cost the club MILLIONS. Do you really think that would've been smart?
Greenberg may have covered up someone's mess, but the world is viscous, and you must be equally as viscous if you want to survive in it.
Greenberg was a GREAT CEO for our club. Blind Freddy can see that Nasheed.