Dogs_01
Barba 2010
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
- Messages
- 166
- Reaction score
- 0
exactly.. i was gunna say dat 2. lolroberts to hooker and barba to 5/8
exactly.. i was gunna say dat 2. lolroberts to hooker and barba to 5/8
lol .... That's what I thought this thread was about when I first saw itCanterbury Rd
1.) Gidley
2.) Hayne
3.) Jennings
4.) Cooper/Lyon
5.) Monogan
6.) Campese
7.) Wallace
9.) Farah
Players who should be automatic selections: Gidley, Gallen, Jennings, Campese, Farah
lol at thisthats a hektic back row
lol sorry, but Gidley is a much better player than patten, in fact gidley is one of the best players in the nrl, Patten is not even close to that level, he's a terrific fullback and always has been but Gidley is better and only a blind Luke Patten fan would think otherwise lol.Gidley over Patten? Pfft cmon that's hilarious selectors.
Because he is an absolute gun, and without him they'd be getting a hiding to nothing every single week?why does everyone have campese in their team? raiders are going sh1thouse this season.
Barba at 5/8 would kill usSo if Ennis gets picked for NSW, who will play hooker for us. I know Roberts has been playing pretty well at 5/8, but during origin I would like to see him at hooker and Barba at 5/8. I really don't want to see that nim-rod Sullivan.
He has played full 80 at fullback on 2 ocassions.I would like roberts 9 and barba 6 too, but i dont think barba is a 80min player. hes very explosive but he hasnt played 80 for us ever yet has he (in FG - i know he has previously in lower grades.)? I think moore sees him as more of a bench player at the moment as hes still very raw.
due to this, i think its very unlikely we will see this combo. moore is likely to play sullivan, much to most of our regret.