oh deary, deary me!!
I give you
Evidence A: "
The Spanish flu that occurred around the end of the WW1 wiped out roughly a third of the world’s population"
World Population-by-Year (link)
Conservatively, I'll grant the estimated 1900 World population of 1,600,000,000 (which was likely much closer to 2B almost two decades later)
CDC Spanish Flu report - 50,000,000 deaths (estimates between 17-100M).
A sprinkling of simple math: fatality rate of 0.03125 or
three percent.
You are an order of magnitude off in your foundations or basic understanding.
This probably happens to you a lot in life, doesn't it?
Perhaps you just read the first line of
this paper (link)?
I give you
Evidence B: "
I’m not saying it doesn’t exist"
My interpretation of the above capture from your earlier post is that you understand coronavirus to be driven solely by media.
Question: Do you believe coronavirus does exist and there is a global pandemic affecting the majority of populations in an attempt to stop the spread of the virus?
I give you
Evidence C: "
only 3% Of the cases is it fatal."
Almost precisely aligned with 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus) [or Spanish flu] fatality estimates, as proven above, that you comparatively claimed was far worse than coronavirus.
Your summary:
"
At the same time coronavirus is wiping out the population, easily more than 100 will have been born . Safe to more than double the amount of people will be born than will contract covid"
Interpretation:
Oh but because more babies were born during the pandemic, which restored population levels above pandemic-deaths, everything is actually fine?
Is that your logic - excuse my request for clarity, you do not seem to follow a consistent narrative.