Ive always felt Cam McKiness had am issue with his mouth / jaw area as his mouth always look like he is Hannibal.Yes, no being able to use fatigue as a reason as it was 8 seconds into the game
There are a couple of lines in that article you posted which rings true of the incident in our game...
The judiciary panel accepted the right of a defender to come off his line at speed but he must avoid forceful and dangerous contact with the opposing player...
“They have been unsanctioned in the past but obviously moving forward, they are now going to be sanctioning those cases.
“I don’t know if that changes teams’ tactics in terms of how they tackle or the factor of line-speed with the potential to have less time to make tackles.”
I thought that there should have been at least some sort of alarm bells ringing with the contact especially when the same player who was the tackler in that instance, Mcinnes, was done for a dangerous tackle penalty two minutes later.
Like most workplaces, the boss gets the weekends off, so the only ones working are the ones doing it for the $$$So if it's a clear error that they admit to, how does the bunker get it wrong when the whole point of the bunker is to have senior officials in there who get these calls right?
Im not sure how any bulldog supporter could say that was no try. So fkn frustrating. That changed the gameConfirmed by the ref boss himself we got rorted. Massive LOL at the idiots who came out saying it was the correct decision, give yourselves an uppercut.
They will just penalise our linespeed (inside 12-15m) and ruck to death when we play with intentAnyways I’ll be at Belmore which is a must win I think Canterbury will come out firing and and hitting hard to win
And so it should have. I was correct in my reading of the rules regarding mutual infringement that it cannot under any circumstance be the ruling when a defender collides with the referee. Perhaps the officials need a lesson in correct understanding of the English language.Annesley just reviewed the no try call and said it should have been awarded. *****
Graham Annesley weekly football briefing - Round 2
NRL head of football elite competitions Graham Annesley holds his weekly football briefing relating to Round 2 of the 2024 Telstra Premiership.www.nrl.com
What’s the point of annesley coming out and saying it’s a try not going to change anything.And so it should have. I was correct in my reading of the rules regarding mutual infringement that it cannot under any circumstance be the ruling when a defender collides with the referee. Perhaps the officials need a lesson in correct understanding of the English language.
At the end of the day, yet another blunder cost us a try at a crucial time in the game, not the only error by the referee or bunker might I add...
That is true but it simply once again points out the fact that referees and the bunker need to be better and that they do in fact need to be held accountable.What’s the point of annesley coming out and saying it’s a try not going to change anything.
Not that I care about betting but I bet (haha no pun intended) that there’d be a few that put money on Kikau for anytime tryscorer, who would love this news.They should adjust score and give us 6 points, Gronk’s. then people can lay off our attack, we made double digits. Should reimburse my betting slip too bitches
That was him?! He was the other guy in the pic whatshisname posted on here the other day. I mean, they’re both refs so not surprising they would train together or whatever they were doing, but interesting that they happened to fuck us after whatshisname said about us.Guess we can thank Todd Smith the video ref for that one.
That’s impossible to say. We get the ball back as well as the points and who knows, the confidence rises and we might go on with it?Confirmed to be an error by the refs, they should be forced to forfeit their pay for the match, it didn’t cost us the win but they need to learn the hard way.
my reference to not winning was the decision for kiks, over all with all the other stuff ups it could have been possible.That’s impossible to say. We get the ball back as well as the points and who knows, the confidence rises and we might go on with it?
It was the fact we had several other non-try scoring decisions go against us, that was the real killer though. Not directed at you, but the people that say “oh we lost it on our own, it wasn’t the ref”. Like seriously?!? So possession isn’t important? Lol like come on this is just basic rugby league. The more calls that don’t go your way, the more possession your opposition has. It makes a huge difference if you don’t get most or all the 50/50s. We hung in there for ages even after we looked completely gassed. An extra few sets is all it can take to completely drain any remaining energy.
Was thinking the same thing or better still just get rid of the bunker altogether would also save $millions.Can these rorting refs/video bunker guys please ring Graham Annalslee before they make a decision.
They don't seem to be able to get the calls right.