- Joined
- Nov 28, 2016
- Messages
- 16,561
- Reaction score
- 20,641
Nothing about procreation though is there? So I guess John Howard got it wrong1. The current definition of marriage is clear in that it is between a man and a woman and to the exclusion of all others.
That's fantastic that you could make the case that procreation is important. Now please make the case that SSM is going to stop human procreation2. Yes they are important to me as an individual but I would also make the case that the continuation of the human race is a parameter which is important to every individual on this earth (including homosexuals).
I know it's not. I know you've inferred that it's a worldwide definition. But now I'm asking you to provide me a detailed definition that's accepted worldwide and 5 living examples of that strict definition3. It is not my definition, it is the most commonly accepted interpretation of marriage that exists in this world, and extends