U.S. Politics Discussion 2.0

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • The Kennel is firing up for some rugby league chat — don't miss it! The best comment during the live has the chance to win tickets to the Bulldogs Vs Cowboys game as well as Kennel Merch! Watch Live Here
Guess integrity doesn't pay.

Of the 7 Indiana senators that voted against redistricting because.... it was illegal under their own rules. They were all competing with Nappyskank bootlickers that were directly endorsed.

5 of the 7 lost their primaries.

Meanwhile in Michigan, a special election for a state senate seat was won narrowly by a dem. So they keep control in Michigan.

And over to Ohio, Governor and Couchfkrs old seat are up for grabs. Noteworthy because Vivek Imabigpharmaswarmy is in the running for Governor. Polls have both dem candidates in front - first time in 20 years. Just to give u an idea what lengths Vivek is going to - $10B (yes billion) ad campaign has just started. The dem is a local doctor who worked herself up to some level of success.

Perfect microcosm of local, respected but underfunded vs fly in, snake oil salesman but with money to burn. Interesting to see if substance can overcome coin.
 
Guess integrity doesn't pay.

Of the 7 Indiana senators that voted against redistricting because.... it was illegal under their own rules. They were all competing with Nappyskank bootlickers that were directly endorsed.

5 of the 7 lost their primaries.

Meanwhile in Michigan, a special election for a state senate seat was won narrowly by a dem. So they keep control in Michigan.

And over to Ohio, Governor and Couchfkrs old seat are up for grabs. Noteworthy because Vivek Imabigpharmaswarmy is in the running for Governor. Polls have both dem candidates in front - first time in 20 years. Just to give u an idea what lengths Vivek is going to - $10B (yes billion) ad campaign has just started. The dem is a local doctor who worked herself up to some level of success.

Perfect microcosm of local, respected but underfunded vs fly in, snake oil salesman but with money to burn. Interesting to see if substance can overcome coin.
It's 10 Million not billion
 
newsthump_1778079967555.jpg
 
Gotta love Howard Buttlick.

Agreed to front Congress about Epstein. Under oath and on camera.

Turns up. Immediately refuses to testify under oath. Refuses to testify on camera. And rolls out 'I can't remember' time and time again.

Pedos gotta pedo.
 


  • US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the military objectives of so-called “Operation Epic Fury” have concluded and the offensive stage of the war with Iran is “over”. Speaking at the White House press briefing, Rubio insisted that ongoing US military action in the strait of Hormuz is “defensive” in nature and a separate operation, in line with the Trump administration’s argument that it doesn’t need approval from Congress to continue the war against Iran. “There’s no shooting unless we’re shot at first,” he told reporters, urging Iran to “make the sensible choice” and negotiate a deal.

IRAN:

images
 
Donald won’t be happy and may feel a bit insecure. ….


Lutnick admits to having prolonged ties to Epstein in closed-door interview​

The Commerce Secretary sat for a transcribed interview with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee as part of the panel’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation.


For reasons he said were “inexplicable,” Howard Lutnick acknowledged visiting Jeffrey Epstein’s island seven years after he claimed to have severed his relationship with the convicted sex offender, according to lawmakers present for the Commerce Secretary’s closed-door testimony Wednesday

He was evasive, nervous — he was dishonest,” Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.) told reporters during a break in the hourslong proceedings. “He would not admit to lying, which he clearly did.”

In an interview, Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) further suggested that if her party retook the House majority, Democrats could call Lutnick back in for additional questioning in a public hearing — or, at the very least, testify under oath on video.
“They deserve to see the sweat on the secretary’s brow as he struggles to answer basic questions about his lies to the American people,” said Rep. James Walkinshaw (D-Va.).
Lutnick appeared before lawmakers Wednesday for a transcribed interview, not a deposition, meaning he did not need to take an oath of honesty and the proceedings were not recorded on video.
Still, House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) warned, “If we find that there were any misstatements by Lutnick, it’s a felony to lie to Congress, and you’ll be held accountable.”
Comer also defended his decision not to require Lutnick’s interview be videotaped, saying the panel would release a transcript to the public and it will be up to the American people to “judge whether [Lutnick’s] credibility was damaged or not.”






Lutnick has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein’s crimes. But he has been under scrutiny from members of both parties since federal materials in the Epstein matter revealed the longtime Cantor Fitzgerald CEO visited Epstein’s now-infamous retreat in the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2012. He had originally said he broke ties with Epstein in 2005.
But the stakes are high for Lutnick — the first Cabinet secretary to testify before the Oversight Committee with a congressional majority of the same party in recent history, according to Comer. Prior administration officials were ousted by President Donald Trump soon after politically damaging appearances before lawmakers on Capitol Hill — notably Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Even the Kentucky Republican acknowledged to reporters before the interview Wednesday that Lutnick “wasn’t 100 percent truthful” in the past when describing the timeline of his relationship with Epstein.



According to one person granted anonymity to describe the closed-door proceedings, Lutnick told the Oversight panel that he was neighbors with Epstein between 2005 and 2019.
Around the time that Lutnick and Epstein became neighbors, Lutnick and his wife met Epstein for a 10-to-15 minute coffee, during which time he received a tour of Epstein’s home and viewed a massage table that has become synonymous with Epstein’s sexual exploitation of trafficked women, the person added.


Lutnick told congressional investigators that he decided then he did not want to associate with Epstein. But Lutnick admitted he, his family, and friends had a short lunch in 2012 at Epstein’s island home, according to the person with knowledge of the interview. He recalled being unsettled that Epstein’s assistant had found out he was in the U.S. Virgin Islands to extend the invitation in the first place.
Committee Democrats told reporters that Lutnick ultimately could not explain why he went to Epstein’s island, with Ansari saying the Cabinet official described the decision as “inexplicable” and that their interactions were “meaningless” and “inconsequential.”
Lutnick also said he and Epstein met in 2011 to discuss renovations on Epstein’s home in Manhattan and that he never saw Epstein engage in inappropriate conduct with young women, the person familiar with the interview said.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said that Lutnick admitted to conferring with the administration about the Epstein saga. But, Walkinshaw said, Lutnick would not answer questions about whether he spoke with Trump in advance of his testimony Wednesday.
A Commerce spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Comer and Rep. William Timmons of South Carolina were the only Republicans present for the testimony Wednesday. But Comer disputed the accusation he was intentionally scheduling interviews with high-profile witnesses like Lutnick during congressional recess weeks or session days where most members fly back to their districts.
He also did not rule out videotaping the committee’s upcoming interview with Bondi, whose testimony was subpoenaed prior to her removal from office. She is scheduled to appear before the panel on May
 
Same dribble, different day.
Had to laugh when asked about the” deal” and Trump says that” you don’t know that that they refuse to submit.”
The only one who doesn’t know anything is Trump himself…..

Oh and for something that’s not a war .. he said it again…WAR….






 
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/othe...31&cvid=69fbc9dca2434c25bdc2e5ab316c6eef&ei=8

Washinton Post reporting that 228 structures or pieces of equipment at 15 bases accross ME have been destroyed or extensively damaged. 53% of THAAD interceptors and 43% of Patriot interceptors have been burned through April 8. Four THAAD radar systems have also been destroyed/heavily damaged, at $300M USD replacement cost a pop... So much WINNING! :sweatsmile:
 
At war, high gas prices, homelessness, unaffordability at a high but yeah let’s worry about the more important things in life……



President Donald Trump summoned reporters to the Oval Office on Wednesday touting the upcoming Ultimate Fighting Championship match that will take place at the White House in June.

Watch Trump's remarks in the video player above.

Trump repeatedly called the UFC fighters present "all champions" saying "our country is invited" to the event scheduled for June 14.

"We're having a big fight. It's never gonna happen again. Never happened before," Trump told reporters.

UFC fighter Justin Gaethje praised Trump of his support for the sport saying he was a "big part" of having it enter the mainstream.

"They thought we were just absolute animals," Gathje said.

"Well, they were right about that," Trump replied.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/othe...31&cvid=69fbc9dca2434c25bdc2e5ab316c6eef&ei=8

Washinton Post reporting that 228 structures or pieces of equipment at 15 bases accross ME have been destroyed or extensively damaged. 53% of THAAD interceptors and 43% of Patriot interceptors have been burned through April 8. Four THAAD radar systems have also been destroyed/heavily damaged, at $300M USD replacement cost a pop... So much WINNING! :sweatsmile:
Wait: You’re suggesting Donny might’ve lied despite what the sats show?? Sacrilege! :-)

IMG_3262.jpeg
 

Trump would 'fire' Howard Lutnick if he saw video of testimony, say oversight Democrats​

Following closed-door testimony from Howard Lutnick before the House oversight committee on his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, Democrats called the commerce secretary’s performance “embarrassing”.

“If Donald Trump had seen the video transcript, he would have fired Howard Lutnick,” said congressman Ro Khanna, a progressive Democrat from California.

Lawmakers pointed to alleged inconsistencies between Lutnick’s previous comments on podcasts that he stopped associating with the late sex offender after2005

The justice department’s release of case files showed that Lutnick had two engagements with Epstein years past that. He attended a 2011 event at Epstein’s home. And Lutnick’s family had lunch with Epstein on his private island in 2012four years after Epstein was sentenced to 13 months in jail for procuring a minor for prostitution.

Lutnick admitted to the 2012 lunch during his 10 February testimony before the Senate appropriations committee. “I did have lunch with him, as I was on a boat going across on a family vacation,” Lutnick said. In that testimony, Lutnick also insisted that he “barely had anything to do” with Epstein.

According to Suhas Subramanyam, a Democratic representative of Virginia, the commerce secretary said “he could remember nothing about the visit to the island. Couldn’t remember why he was there. Couldn’t remember anything he saw.”

Oversight Democrats also said that Lutnick did not answer their questions about whether he spoke with Donald Trump ahead of giving testimony before the panel today.

“I feel very comfortable saying that Howard Lutnick is a pathological liar who is enabling the most egregious cover-up in American history,” congresswoman Yassamin Ansari told reporters, while noting that the commerce secretary told lawmakers it was “inexplicable” that he visited Epstein’s private island. Lutnick described his encounters with Epstein as “meaningless and inconsequential,” Ansari added.


 
Back
Top Bottom