Tonga just got screwed out of the greatest comeback in history

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bob dog

Hectik defence
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
19,380
Reaction score
3,600
It was the correct decision, it doesn't matter if it was knocked out, it came out and wasn't grounded.
 

Dognacious

Kennel Immortal
Staff member
Administrator
Premium Member
NF Draft Champion
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
23,568
Reaction score
11,007
Not a try. Close but no cigar. Good fightback from Tonga, they left it way too late though.
 

Rodzilla

Terry Lamb 1996
Joined
Dec 22, 2004
Messages
42,551
Reaction score
6,153
Just to clarify I have read a couple of times now that if Whitehead deliberately attempted to dislodge the ball then it's deemed a strip and play on, versus if he only attempted to make a tackle and his arm unintentionally knocked the ball out then it's a knock on. Do others agree this is the rule?

Will be checking on the replay today to have another look. As others have said how the ref couldn't go upstairs is wrong.
yeah i think you have to be playing at the ball, like when you wrap your arms around to make a tackle and touch the ball that was passed its not 6 again
 

Kennelnator

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 20, 2016
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
1,447
Correct decision everyday of the week.

Chicken legs was right there and there was no way he should of sent it upstairs. The most frustrating decisions are when a try is scored in the corner and the ref and touchie are within a bees dick of the try and they send it upstairs.

Most tackles that are made is to secure the arm carrying the ball or trying to dislodge the ball with a hard "impact hit". A strip is when you have your arm on the ball or are holding the ball carriers arm and you rip the ball out of the players hand or push the ball out of their hands.

Fifita has himself to blame for his style of ball carrying, but most importantly not going through the hands as Tonga had an overlap
 

chisdog

Kennel Legend
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
8,165
Reaction score
7,811
lol. over 20k signatures! The result is not going to change.

I still cannot believe that Cecchin didn't think that a try scoring opportunity which decided the result of the game in a world cup semi final did not warrant video review. Regardless of whether it was a try or not, there is no way that Cecchin could of been a hundred percent certain that he got the correct call. If this is not a time to go to a video ref when do you go? The amount of times that a video ref is used when there is far more certainty that a try is scored makes the decision not to refer to the video ref even more puzzling.
Especially when the game time was up. Look at cricket where umpires go up for run outs even though they are 99.9% sure they aren't out. Why? Just to make sure the correct decision is made & because they are fixing the stumps anyway & it will not delay the game.
 

Mr Invisible

Banned
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
47
Just watched the footage... it really could have gone either way.

It does appear that the bal is stripped out, BUT the NRL always make noise about the onus being on the ball carried to ensure the ball is secure. Seen it countless times in the NRL.

So in summary:
Based on footage and logic - should be play on and a try.
Based on NRL rules and previous identical scenarios in the NRL - should have been called a knock on.
 

EXPLORER

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
15,743
Reaction score
7,930
Just watched the footage... it really could have gone either way.

It does appear that the bal is stripped out, BUT the NRL always make noise about the onus being on the ball carried to ensure the ball is secure. Seen it countless times in the NRL.

So in summary:
Based on footage and logic - should be play on and a try.
Based on NRL rules and previous identical scenarios in the NRL - should have been called a knock on.
Was cleared by archer
So must have been the right call
 

Mr 95%

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
22,489
Reaction score
23,495
Tonga making the final would've taken League up to another level in the Island nations.

This whole World Cup was rigged to make it an Australia vs England GF
Absolutely..Meninga vs Bennett..

Tonga’s run has probably lifted League already.. And thinking about it..their success was probably scripted too!
 

The Innovator

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 5, 2016
Messages
1,482
Reaction score
1,139
What a ridiculous thread to start. It was a loose carry FFS.
We shit on refs for continuously going to the video ref and when he doesn’t we get the shits.
Why take look after look after look and then say no try.
The crowd would have got more riled.
I can’t stand Checchin, but he was spot on.
 

Bad Billy

Kennel Immortal
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
16,670
Reaction score
12,722
If that tackle happens 10mins in on the 50m line, it gets called a knock-on and no one gives a fuck.
Doesn’t matter the gravity of the situation, the correct decision was made.
 

Nate DAWG

Kennel Legend
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
10,841
Reaction score
25,026
If that tackle happens 10mins in on the 50m line, it gets called a knock-on and no one gives a fuck.
Doesn’t matter the gravity of the situation, the correct decision was made.
Your right and it was probably a loose carry, but if you are not going to refer a try scoring opportunity which decides a world cup semi final then scrap the video ref system altogether. The fact that it wasn't referred is the joke. There is an argument that it was a loose carry and there is an angle that looks like it was raked out. Cecchin should of referred as a no try, the pommy video ref would of said no try and then at least a process which respected the gravity of the decision would of been followed. People are celebrating that Cecchin should be congratulated for his courage in making a correct decision and not going to the video ref. Where was his courage in awarding a penalty for the entire back line being offside on the same play??
 

Boxer

THE BOSS
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Your right and it was probably a loose carry, but if you are not going to refer a try scoring opportunity which decides a world cup semi final then scrap the video ref system altogether. The fact that it wasn't referred is the joke. There is an argument that it was a loose carry and there is an angle that looks like it was raked out. Cecchin should of referred as a no try, the pommy video ref would of said no try and then at least a process which respected the gravity of the decision would of been followed. People are celebrating that Cecchin should be congratulated for his courage in making a correct decision and not going to the video ref. Where was his courage in awarding a penalty for the entire back line being offside on the same play??
Cause he called it a knock on before Fifita scored,
No need for a video ref for a on field knock on.
 

Trendsetter

Kennel Enthusiast
Gilded
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
905
Odd, I've seen it go against players making a tackle plenty of times who didn't even have eyes on the ball.

I've always seen it as a 50/50. Refs discretion. There's never been a black and white rule in this scenario as the rulings have always been a roll of the dice.
I've also seen balls being deliberately stripped as the defending player pulls his arm out of the tackle and it's ruled a loose carry or lost ball.

In saying that, I really couldn't agree or disagree with anyone here. In my opinion, it's a 50/50 that was left in the hands of the ref... which is wrong, because it determines the game and gives the the power and ability to decide outcomes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top