Thoughts on the Lomax Debacle ?

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
I bet Lomax is playing in the NRL by magic round.
I have nothing against him and im not against him returning to NRL.

But its on Parra's terms. If a club is willing to trade Parra with a decent player, im sure Ryles will be open to it.
 
Whats going on here. Tbf i havent followed the saga but surely Lomax plays in nrl this year
The guys in his prime needs to be in the game
The issue as i understand it is Parra holds the cards and with their cap near full, any trade deal will require Parra to offload a dead wood player on big bucks and get a good/elite player in return.

If this situation and court decision was done before Parra filled their roster and cap floor, it would have been an easier trade.

Just swap Lomax with a player of equal or near-equal value and they probably would be happy.

But the timing is the killer here and their cap dictates their position.
 
Lomax is not overated.
He is easily Origin level and has played well in it too.
Wasn't he rubbish last year? Plus he is behind To'o and Kiraz. If the Blosers had a decent coach, he wouldn't get picked in front of the other two.

Plus he is an unloyal diva jumping ship everytime he gets sand in his vagina.

It will be a mistake on and off the field if we sign him.
 
Wasn't he rubbish last year? Plus he is behind To'o and Kiraz. If the Blosers had a decent coach, he wouldn't get picked in front of the other two.

Plus he is an unloyal diva jumping ship everytime he gets sand in his vagina.

It will be a mistake on and off the field if we sign him.
I suspect he would fail our no dick heads policy.


Team Work
 
What’s happening to Parra here, is like fucking a married woman, then marrying her, then getting distressed when she fucks around on you too.
 
I can't help but think of this quote from one of the greatest masterpieces ever filmed to surmise this whole situation:

aa7f34d2d04711c1245d5e92546f8d49-1593647169.png
 

Attachments

  • aa7f34d2d04711c1245d5e92546f8d49-1593647169.png
    aa7f34d2d04711c1245d5e92546f8d49-1593647169.png
    295.5 KB · Views: 5
Lomax reported to be sighted coming out of Union head office today but wouldnt be surprised if a Lomax/ Barnett deal ends up happening.
 
What’s happening to Parra here, is like fucking a married woman, then marrying her, then getting distressed when she fucks around on you too.
Hope thats just an observation rather than you being able to relate to it on an unfortunate personal level, sticky situation.
 
Lomax reported to be sighted coming out of Union head office today but wouldnt be surprised if a Lomax/ Barnett deal ends up happening.
Lomax to warriors?
 
Thats why they settled. The nrLOL didn't want to air their dirty laundry in court.

Storm were offering salary cap dispensation, only the nrLOL can offer dispensation....
Was that to do with them taking the rest of Mattersons contract $416k and then offering $300k for Lomax?
 
Was that to do with them taking the rest of Mattersons contract $416k and then offering $300k for Lomax?
Yeah him.

SEN also reported that Parra offered him to the Storm but he didn't agree to it.
 
Yeah him.

SEN also reported that Parra offered him to the Storm but he didn't agree to it.
Why would you consider having a player who would rather take a suspension so he didn't have to pay the fine and who also has concussion problems?

After being "offered" he spat the dummy because the storm wouldnt give him an option for a second year.Muppet.
 
Imagine if you spammed this thread arguing with numerous people with complete and utter certainty that Lomax and Melbourne would absolutely win this case on the grounds that the premise of restraint of trade would nullify stipulations that both parties (Lomax and the Eels) agreed to as part of a conditional release.

Man that'd be embarrassing.
 
Back
Top Bottom