chris_e_fresh
The Virtual One
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2004
- Messages
- 8,084
- Reaction score
- 844
Let’s talk about how shit Chelsea are
Haven’t Liverpool spent over a billion for one title?As for Liverpool being outgunned, won't bite but good try. Chelsea? We won.
The BIG difference is that Liverpool have a way of playing which is easily identifiable. The direction we're going in is clear. We do spend big money on occassions but when we do it's on GREAT players that improve the team. Not shit players i.e. Maguire, Pogba, that make Man U worse.
If you don't want to talk about Man U's issues, then OK. Each to their own. I just don't understand how you can be so blind or naive personally?
Did say Fat Frank would be the first high profile manager to go. Took a massive risk spending so much straight up. Especially with so little time to create cohesion in the team. Think in 10 games they'll be doing well but maybe by then they'll be out of reach of the title?Let’s talk about how shit Chelsea are
Deflection deflection. It's ok mate. I used to do the same when we were shit, so understand your desire to do the sameHaven’t Liverpool spent over a billion for one title?
You were talking bout money well spentDeflection deflection. It's ok mate. I used to do the same when we were shit, so understand your desire to do the same
Looks like they want a winger right or wrongDembele ehy? I still think you'll go back in for Sancho personally, but if it's true that you've 'shifted' your focus onto Dembele then it's utter madness. As a loan I could get, but outright purchase at the price they're asking? Big call if true, but surely your club wouldn't do that?
Let's not talk about Liverpool.Looks like they want a winger right or wrong
I rkn so they can move Greenwood in the middle n rotate with martial
At that price?
55 mil for 23 year old a French international ? Who was bought for 110m
You guys paid 30 mil for a 30 year old midfielder with no contract left........
Paying 108 mil for sancho in the current financial climate is mad
Sorry 400k a week. Plus 10 m signing on bonus. Plus 10m for his agent.Cavanni = panic buy. 350k a week panic buy.
You lot have learnt NOTHING
It’s a 172k per week muppetSorry 400k a week. Plus 10 m signing on bonus. Plus 10m for his agent.
Panic buy especially when he's been offfered to every club in the world and no one would touch him.
Better do some research son...Cavanni = panic buy. 350k a week panic buy.
You lot have learnt NOTHING
You're deflecting again? Nah, not you not a panic buy at all. He's been a free agent for how long and you buy him a few days before the windows closed? Not a panic buy thoBetter do some research son...
170odd
Actually agree with you for once partly, panic but yes but Cavani and his agent fucked themselves by their wage and fee demands too which leaves them desperate too. Panic from both parties. Jose was right, finishing second behind city is his greatest accomplishment, look how handicapped he was with Woodward, Judge etc running a shit showYou're deflecting again? Nah, not you not a panic buy at all. He's been a free agent for how long and you buy him a few days before the windows closed? Not a panic buy tho
But was I correct and you wrong?You're deflecting again? Nah, not you not a panic buy at all. He's been a free agent for how long and you buy him a few days before the windows closed? Not a panic buy tho
You were correct and I was wrong. I saw someone putting all the wages, signing on fee, and also agents fee together which amounts close to over 350k a week. So you're right.But was I correct and you wrong?
Well, it seems as though you've got your LB which you wanted? So that's good?Fuck the glazers and Woodward
Incompetent fucktards
If we had the right owners we would be challenging for the title this season.
If we had Sir Alex Ferguson he'd win the league with the current squad and we wouldn't need sancho