Soccer The Manchester United SUPER Thread

1000049090.jpg
 
Doggies Utd said:
This is way more out then the Newcastle v Arsenal one and you all have the hide to try and pretend this one was in.

No one wants to talk about how forest were given 3 goal kicks for obvious corners and when we got a booking for a similar challenge that was let go by the referee
View attachment 151191
Click to expand...
"Way more out" says all we need to know about your ball knowledge my son. Remind me again about how much of the ball should be over the line to be in ...
 
Tassie Devil said:
"Way more out" says all we need to know about your ball knowledge my son. Remind me again about how much of the ball should be over the line to be in ...
Click to expand...
I don’t even bother to read what you have to say anymore because i already know it’s going to be the most mind-numbing stupid shit ive ever read in my life
 
Doggies Utd said:
I don’t even bother to read what you have to say anymore because i already know it’s going to be the most mind-numbing stupid shit ive ever read in my life
Click to expand...
So ... in other words you can't explain why that ball was in even though you say it "was way more out" ...

Fair enough. Though it's a shame as clearly you don't know much about football (yes ... it's called football).

Either way ... I thought as much.

It's actually a pretty basic rule tbh. The whole of the ball has to have passed over the line to be classed as out. Even a fraction of the ball from a vertical position can still be over the line for it to still be in.

The picture you blew up and shared clearly shows this btw. Yes, the bottom of the ball is over the line but from a vertical position it's pretty clear that the ball was still in.

Either way. Your loss my friend. Happy to teach you things if you need, but ... clearly you're 'above' me so ...

Fair enough.
 
Tassie Devil said:
Tag me next time mate.

Look. I don't go missing wins or losses mate.
Click to expand...
Lol people have lives outside this website. I haven't been commenting even on the dogs stuff. Has nothing to do with winning or losing. I just dont come on the kennel anywhere near how I used to
 
Tassie Devil said:
So ... in other words you can't explain why that ball was in even though you say it "was way more out" ...

Fair enough. Though it's a shame as clearly you don't know much about football (yes ... it's called football).

Either way ... I thought as much.

It's actually a pretty basic rule tbh. The whole of the ball has to have passed over the line to be classed as out. Even a fraction of the ball from a vertical position can still be over the line for it to still be in.

The picture you blew up and shared clearly shows this btw. Yes, the bottom of the ball is over the line but from a vertical position it's pretty clear that the ball was still in.

Either way. Your loss my friend. Happy to teach you things if you need, but ... clearly you're 'above' me so ...

Fair enough.
Click to expand...
Again didn’t bother reading most of it but skimmed, if you watched the video I quoted it explains my argument quite clearly and what I meant by how this was more obviously out then the Arsenal one and how the camera angle affects our perception
 
We have the most reactionary fanbase in the world, sesko and Cunha have one bad game against some of the toughest and most physical CBS and apparently Hojlund is better and Cunha can’t pass.
 
Doggies Utd said:
Again didn’t bother reading most of it but skimmed, if you watched the video I quoted it explains my argument quite clearly and what I meant by how this was more obviously out then the Arsenal one and how the camera angle affects our perception
Click to expand...
Saw it didn't agree
 
Doggies Utd said:
We have the most reactionary fanbase in the world, sesko and Cunha have one bad game against some of the toughest and most physical CBS and apparently Hojlund is better and Cunha can’t pass.
Click to expand...
Ummm no?

"One bad game" ... have they been in good form this year?

While I agree that this Hojlund call is stupid, though he is in good form in Italy, Šeško and Cunha have hardly set the world on fire. In fact, Šeško has been pretty ordinary mate.

I saw some vote by player managers as him being the worst transfer of the summer? Have been watching him for ages and have never bought into all the positive talk about him.

He's not a United level signing imo
 
Hansta said:
Lol people have lives outside this website. I haven't been commenting even on the dogs stuff. Has nothing to do with winning or losing. I just dont come on the kennel anywhere near how I used to
Click to expand...
You have a life outside of this website? Fuck me. Good for you lol

A certain United supporter was throwing shots at me about not replying immediately after Liverpool losing even though we're in completely different timezones, so my comments about not going missing win or loss were directed at him not you.

Glad you've got a life though mate, I need to get one of those! Lol
 
Tassie Devil said:
Ummm no?

"One bad game" ... have they been in good form this year?

While I agree that this Hojlund call is stupid, though he is in good form in Italy, Šeško and Cunha have hardly set the world on fire. In fact, Šeško has been pretty ordinary mate.

I saw some vote by player managers as him being the worst transfer of the summer? Have been watching him for ages and have never bought into all the positive talk about him.

He's not a United level signing imo
Click to expand...
Sesko has a lot to work on but he’s hardly the worst signing, same g/a as gyokores more than your 150 and 130m signings who have 1 g/a between them and garnacho. his link up play and holding the ball up have been good. I also had reservations about signing him and he still might flop but he’s not been that bad

The only reason cunha “not in good form” is because he hasn’t scored more than one, if you actually watched the entire game he’s been great with keeping possession and holding the ball and driving past players and been unlucky to hit the posts on a number of occasions

Both could definitely improve but that they haven’t had many bad games
 
Doggies Utd said:
Sesko has a lot to work on but he’s hardly the worst signing, same g/a as gyokores more than your 150 and 130m signings who have 1 g/a between them and garnacho. his link up play and holding the ball up have been good. I also had reservations about signing him and he still might flop but he’s not been that bad

The only reason cunha “not in good form” is because he hasn’t scored more than one, if you actually watched the entire game he’s been great with keeping possession and holding the ball and driving past players and been unlucky to hit the posts on a number of occasions

Both could definitely improve but that they haven’t had many bad games
Click to expand...
He hasn't been good though mate and you didn't pay nothing for him ... 80+ million. Right? Hardly a small fee.

For a big note signing who should be leading the line I just don't think he does enough. I wouldn't call him a flop as he hasn't had time but he hasn't been good either.

Cunha I quite like as a player and think he'll do well for you if his attitude is right. He fights for the ball. Works hard. And is a tricky bastard.

If your fans are writing him off then they're idiots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top