I don't think being a challenger for the top 4 by 2024 is out of the question and it should defiantly be the goal. If McInness was the only available hooker then I'd take him but I hope we aim higher. He can come in and do a job but there's a limit on how far he can take us.There is a lot of sense in what you say. However I dont believe even if we got a top hooker we could regularly challenge for top 4 for a few years. Our club has allowed mediocrity & poor results become normal & expected. I think we are going to have to re learn how to win over the next 2-4 years along with allowing out halves develop. It is for this phase that I see him being beneficial (despite dragons lack of success I see him as a winner). If we can pick up a top line attacking 9 i am for it, if not i see a lot of upsides from signing Mcinnes.
Versatility is massive in the current game, you don't necessarily want to sub your hooker off but you also don't want to play someone at 9 for 80.McInnes is a mid tier hooker for mine there is a big gap between Smith, Cook, Grant, Api and Hodgson and the rest.
I don't really see his versatility being a big plus if you're paying him big coin to play hooker?
I guess it all comes down to personal preference I'd rather roll the dice on Smith or Clarke over McInnes.
Lacking a vagina for mine to be a quality hooker.If Wakeham goes on a massive steroid cycle and puts on about 10-15kgs of muscle then he would be a good choice at hooker...
As it stands...It’s one position pretty much everyone would agree we need to improve. The best options off contract in 21 look like Cameron McInnes, Sam Verrills and Jacob Liddell to me. Obviously Harry Grant and Brandon Smith in 22 it’s doubtful Melbourne can keep both. What are your thoughts on those and any other options for next year and beyond?
I hope you are correct re '24 & agree with you on the ceiling for us with McInness, it may be where we are at though...thankfully all of this is 1000% better than where we have been as a club & supporters for far too long...I don't think being a challenger for the top 4 by 2024 is out of the question and it should defiantly be the goal. If McInness was the only available hooker then I'd take him but I hope we aim higher. He can come in and do a job but there's a limit on how far he can take us.
You can look at it this way...Lacking a vagina for mine to be a quality hooker.
Yep this!!McInnes seems to be very underrated on here.
In my opinion he'd be a brilliant signing. He gets through a mountain of defensive work which is done at a very high standard.
His passing is fantastic and his running game is under rated.
His best assets are his competitiveness and professionalism. Going into 2022 with a young quality spine he'd be a leader in the squad and set a high standard and we'd be mad to not be making enquires.
"Best post."McInnes seems to be very underrated on here.
In my opinion he'd be a brilliant signing. He gets through a mountain of defensive work which is done at a very high standard.
His passing is fantastic and his running game is under rated.
His best assets are his competitiveness and professionalism. Going into 2022 with a young quality spine he'd be a leader in the squad and set a high standard and we'd be mad to not be making enquires.
150% agree the bloke is an 80 minute machineMcInnes seems to be very underrated on here.
In my opinion he'd be a brilliant signing. He gets through a mountain of defensive work which is done at a very high standard.
His passing is fantastic and his running game is under rated.
His best assets are his competitiveness and professionalism. Going into 2022 with a young quality spine he'd be a leader in the squad and set a high standard and we'd be mad to not be making enquires.
Dont agree mcinnes is mediocre, his workrate is the most ive seen, he has skills and if st George didnt have him, they would have gotten the spoon imo.It just needs to get sorted because we aren’t ever going to threaten with JMK or Katoa. There’s nothing on the horizon for 21 unless a miracle happens and a good hooker gets released. Daryl Clark is probably the most likely option if he is genuine about coming to the NRL. McInness and Liddell are upgrades on what we have but are still pretty mediocre in NRL standards. I’d take anyone out of Verrells, Grant or Smith in a heartbeat.
I just want the club to sort it out. Hooker has been a huge issue for far too long but with the current set up it does give me confidence that they will get it done.
Send him to Pattaya lolIf Wakeham goes on a massive steroid cycle and puts on about 10-15kgs of muscle then he would be a good choice at hooker...
His work rate is great but that’s the only positive I see with him. It’s his skill set or lack of that I don’t like. He’s one of those players that gets lots of wraps for his effort plays and rightly so but it glosses over the deficiencies in other areas of his game. He seems to the type of player you either rate or don’t.Dont agree mcinnes is mediocre, his workrate is the most ive seen, he has skills and if st George didnt have him, they would have gotten the spoon imo.