The NRL would be apprised of the situation as it is mandatory for a club to report such an event.As I mentioned, first one is a free shot, a warning and being put on notice that second one means auto 12 week suspension ( a la Barba) and the third one sayonara. Any drug tests performed by the NRL of course would automatically be known to the heirachy.I'd like to know that any positive drug tests must be reported immediately to the NRL so shady situations like this don't occur whenever a team wants to move a player on. Not only to keep the players on the straight and narrow, but the clubs need to be kept honest too these days.
They don’t have to plant drugs on anyone. The entire team is on drugs.if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck!!!! Only at the roosters, who else can they plant drugs on....
I only ever read the paper when I go to the Dr, which is thankfully none too often. Only do it to wait out the three quarters of an hour time that the Doc is running late.... Sometimes do it over a coffee at Maccas as well when I am waiting for the kid's out of town bus to bring them home from school.......If this was a Bulldogs player it would be front page news every day for 2 weeks + a 8 page "Investigation report" in the centre pages even if the player had played 20s in 2008.The media wonder why I no longer buy their papers & this is why. I hope the corrupt ones (& that's most of them) lose their jobs.
Honesty & the NRL or anyone associated with it is an oxymoronI'd like to know that any positive drug tests must be reported immediately to the NRL so shady situations like this don't occur whenever a team wants to move a player on. Not only to keep the players on the straight and narrow, but the clubs need to be kept honest too these days.