So what about the NRL pre determining players values around 2013. Remember Parra weren't allowed to pay Kingston and Folau (if he was to be signed) at below market value... Yet SBW was afforded a cheap 'vanilla' contract of around 600k... And cronks degree. You can choose to believe it if it makes you happy and thats ok
As stated previously Cronks degree was part of his NRL contract (https://www.triplem.com.au/story/ho...aled-cooper-cronks-move-to-the-roosters-66688), I really don't get why it's so difficult for you guys to understand that?
A wombat that’s been run over and has his brains splattered out all over the Hume highway outside of Canberra knows the Roosters have cheated the cap. If you can’t see that, I have concerns about your mental age.
Even the axel he bent knows too
Yeah so Hindmarsh has to include autobiography profits in the salary cap but Cronk can have a business degree lol... No matter which way you spin it it's favourites from the NRL
And yet not the wombat, the axel, you or anyone else with all this knowledge of us cheating the cap have the balls to go to the NRL with your proof, I often wonder why that is? Are the ones that know all this about my club so cowardly that they are scared to say something? Surely someone has the stones to detail our cap cheating, find corroboration and then approach the NRL anonymously with all this substantiated proof?
Of course the NRL plays favourites at various times. They played favourites with you guys in the 00s when they allowed you to retain an illegally assembled side. They are currently playing favourites with lol@souffs suspending Sam Burgesses 10K fine for bad mouthing the MRC, allowing them to medically retire Inglis and Burgess without it counting towards the cap and zero punishment for his dick pics. They played favourites with the Nulla allowing them to cheat the cap all through 2016 but magically they were cap compliant on GF day. Who knows whos turn it will be next year?
How the hell are we supposed to prove it? Do we have photographic evidence of Uncle Nick tossing CC a brown paper bag? Do we have access to James Tedesco's personal bank account which shows us money which Uncle Nick generously deposited money into? Of course not. It's what's referred to as 'Common Sense' - and considering every other human on the planet knows it, even those who support other clubs who also happen to be cheating, I doubt you are in a position to demand we go to the NRL with these allegations, because we all know that it will fall on deaf ears. Uncle Nick is the NRL CEO after all, it's only Tood Greenberg who wears the tie.
Common sense is not that common and in this particular scenario it's absent altogether. Obviously you cannot prove anything (shock horror), but why can't you give a common sense explanation as to why a whistleblower has not come forth from the plethora of players and staff we have sacked over the decades? And I don't want some stupid conspiracy theory, give me a common sense explanation.
Because that would be like going to court with blood on your hands.
Didn't stop your whistle blower or the one for the Storm exposing the rorts, why would it stop one for us?Because that would be like going to court with blood on your hands.
"Hey, the club is guilty for this, I was part of it and I knew it was happening all along and did nothing about it..."
I imagine all the players who you guys have given brown paper bags to over the years have left your club on good terms.
You haven't answered my question.I imagine all the players who you guys have given brown paper bags to over the years have left your club on good terms.
Prime example... SBW. Willie Mason.
Remember when Willie Mason signed with the Roosters who miraculously had room for him in their cap by releasing Danny Williams to us
Or how the Roosters unloaded the ranga Dylan Napa for James Tedesco.
Both these cases happened during the off-season when teams had most of their rosters for the following season set.
Thank you.
)
My guess it would involve some of those brown paper bags or other off-book rorts normally reserved for players...
I answered it in the first line.
No you gave me some imagined conspiracy theory. And your imagination is weak when you claim that all, every single one of the players we were supposedly giving paper bags too were ok that we sacked them and cut off their access to those paper bags and none, not one of them sought to expose that once they were no longer beneficiaries of it. It's not hard to shot massive holes in these theories.
