Organisations settle all the time to avoid lengthy and protracted court battles. Settling is in no way proof Rugby Australia didn’t have a case. Just because Folau spins it as a win doesn’t mean it was a win. It just means it was going to cost Rugny Australia a shitload of time, money and resources and they decided it was better to resolve the matter quickly. Rugby Australia was also really struggling financially at that time and having to part with the amount of money Izzy was asking for was likely to send them bankrupt, it stands to reason they didn’t want to take even the slimmest chance of losing if they could get away with paying out a much smaller amount, even if their legal team felt their chances of winning were good.
It is also worth noting that a common term of any settlement is that neither party continues to talk about the case. The first thing that creep did was try to spin the outcome as a “victory” by telling all the fans he hoodwinked into giving him their hard earned money that he received a huge amount of money in the settlement. As Ixzy breached the confidentiality terms of the agreement, Rugby Australia subsequently came out and said the settlement amount was much smaller than Folau claimed, and a small fraction of what he was actually asking for.
Only those who were part of the negotiations can tell which party is telling the truth for sure. But given the fact Izzy asked people who were much worse off than him to crowd fund his campaign, was asking for a huge sum of money that was likely to send Rugby Australia broke if he won, and was the first to break the confidentiality agreement, I know which party I think is less trustworthy. And I’m not talking about Rugby Australia.
Izzy’s a douche. It doesn’t take a court of law to determine that.