They're different players. Elliott is a better attacking player and more modern day lock play style wise. I'm talking more about the situation, losing him to a rival club for an extra 100k or so and him killing it there (I mean if that's what it takes for Elliott to get some credit).Finucane always was and still is a far more complete, consistent and reliable player than Elliott..
Is it a school for ants?
Rubbish.Ive been told he already on over 600k a year has been paid overs for the last 3 years.
His manager probably using the rumours of Bateman offer and try up his price.
I personally think he is only worth 500k Max when playing to potential even that is a stretch.
This Whole Elliott situation is driving me closer to the dark side, tbh .... you’re enjoying this, aren’t you? You’ll come for my profile pic, next.... stupid Marxist snowflake.... trying to erase history!Soy boy latte sipping hipster lefty is going to riot
Ohhh noooooo!!!!
He’s better. He makes Radley look like Brad friggin Morrin.The thing is, Radley and Murray are way better players but Radley would be on about 500k and Murray is on 650k.
If another club pays him 600k, then so be it as he's nowhere near the calibre of those two.
As long as the offer is fair, that's all I can ask. He isn't a player we should be letting go of tho (which imo means we should meet in the middle somewhere in negotiations).If he Wants to go he can go, yes he’s been playing great, but if he wants more coin then he knows where the door is.!!
Most of the team bar a few, and the club should all be on notice to be fair.!!As long as the offer is fair, that's all I can ask. He isn't a player we should be letting go of tho (which imo means we should meet in the middle somewhere in negotiations).
fuck the fair, the only reason he looks good is because everyone around him is shit.As long as the offer is fair, that's all I can ask. He isn't a player we should be letting go of tho (which imo means we should meet in the middle somewhere in negotiations).
That isn't true. That's like saying Arrow isn't good because he plays for the Titans. There are a lot of good established locks in the NRL and Elliott is one of them. Give him some credit.fuck the fair, the only reason he looks good is because everyone around him is shit.
Elliott is living in a false economy. he will be average in a rival team's front row
NoThat isn't true. That's like saying Arrow isn't good because he plays for the Titans. There are a lot of good established locks in the NRL and Elliott is one of them. Give him some credit.
It has to be... at least 3 times bigger!Is it a school for ants?