AlzzBulldog
Kennel Legend
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2014
- Messages
- 8,528
- Reaction score
- 14,131
This has got to be the worst rule change I've ever seen, it's a shocker
Fight me
Fight me
Where you wanna fight hahaWhere is this fight taking place?
It was introduced to protect golden boy Slater after a game where Titans repeatedly kicked it dead to nullify his kick returns... now that he's retired they'll probably bring it back.They should just scrap the rule altogether. It’s stupid.
Also get rid of the zero tackle rule, or make it only for kicks from outside 30m that go dead in goal.
I agree with this. If it can only be effected when 1 on 1 then it removes the 50/50 calls of "did the 2nd tackler drop off milli seconds before ball was stripped ". Less reliance on a referee interpretationDon’t like it, prefer the old rule where as soon as a second defender is involved a strip can’t be made, when teams do it looks like a rugby union rolling mall, and we should be avoiding anything that resembles union
Our refereeing crop are barely capable of hold a lollypop stick and officiate at a school crossing.Our refereeing crop aren't capable of officiating such a rule.
We will get that sorted lol.. chimp can work on the strip, ball handling anywayWhat gets me more is the amount of players/actors who stay down holding their neck since the clamp down on so called crushers.
Maccas Carpark call the boysWhere you wanna fight haha
I think we employ Southy to work with Chimp with stripping and Ball handling together.We will get that sorted lol.. chimp can work on the strip, ball handling anyway
Dont mind the strip but agree with the zero tackle rule.They should just scrap the rule altogether. It’s stupid.
Also get rid of the zero tackle rule, or make it only for kicks from outside 30m that go dead in goal.