Nadia Stamp's Muscular Thighs

[Indiandog]

Anything that can be defined as "adult content", or "sexually suggestive", including excessive clevage.

I know it sounds like a monk/priest made the rules.... but if Googles bots crawl the site and that material is on them, the site risks having its Google Ads account terminated.

It's the same reason why you don't see Google Ads on porn sites (so a friend tells me!), because Google don't want sites containing adult content maknig money from Google ads (also as you can imagine advertisers may frown on their ads showing on such sites).

Tis a bit of a shit go, but all moderators have been asked by Nash to remove such content if it appears (to avoid please explain emails from Google).

so if i show my man boobs with my big black nipples, that would be considered as "adult content"?

@south of heaven

 

[south of heaven]

so if i show my man boobs with my big black nipples, that would be considered as "adult content"?

@south of heaven

Nope that's pure art my freind

 

[Mr Invisible]

so if i show my man boobs with my big black nipples, that would be considered as "adult content"?

That all depends if a user gets and erection as a result of it my friend!

 

[Wolfmother]

so if i show my man boobs with my big black nipples, that would be considered as "adult content"?

@south of heaven

Not if you wear the 'bro'

 

[Wahesh]

In all honesty I didn't think my pic was that bad as it was simply a female wrestler - no cleavage at all, just... muscular thighs. I accept it's been deleted though and won't be carrying on

 

[Hacky McAxe]

In all honesty I didn't think my pic was that bad as it was simply a female wrestler - no cleavage at all, just... muscular thighs. I accept it's been deleted though and won't be carrying on

Can it be considered "Cleavage" when she has pecs instead of breasts?

 

[Wahesh]

Can it be considered "Cleavage" when she has pecs instead of breasts?

There were no pecs in it either. Just... muscular thighs. Exactly what this thread is about.

 

[Mr Invisible]

She wasn't wearing pants .. just underwear.

 

[Wolfmother]

There were no pecs in it either. Just... muscular thighs. Exactly what this thread is about.

I summons @Realist90

 

[Wahesh]

She wasn't wearing pants .. just underwear.

Fair enough. But think of it like a bikini bottom (or something). Well... I've had my say on it.

Are we allowed to post bikini pics though (for future reference)?

 

[Mr Invisible]

Fair enough. But think of it like a bikini bottom (or something). Well... I've had my say on it.
Are we allowed to post bikini pics though (for future reference)?

@Wahesh It would be borderline and most likely removed under the "sexually suggestive / excessive clevage" rule.

@Nash could verify on that one though as I'm not sure on the entire specifics of Googles crackdown.

 

[Wahesh]

 

[Mr Invisible]

How does it feel to know you are looking at a blokes legs @Wahesh ????

This bloke has a bigger cock than Bruce Jenner.

 

[Wahesh]

How does it feel to know you are looking at a blokes legs @Wahesh ????

This bloke has a bigger cock than Bruce Jenner.

Bro I love chunky thighs on a chick... I thought that was common knowledge around here?

 

[The DoggFather]

Bro, that's a dude! Look at its head.

 

[Mr Invisible]

Bro I love chunky thighs on a chick... I thought that was common knowledge around here?

I know you love chunky thighs on a chick... but that's not a chick, it's a bloke.

 

[rainman]

I know you love chunky thighs on a chick... but that's not a chick, it's a bloke.

Balls!

 

[Wahesh]

I know you love chunky thighs on a chick... but that's not a chick, it's a bloke.

Nadia Stamp is a bloke?

 

[Mr Invisible]

Nadia Stamp is a bloke?

Man hands, man jaw, hiding the adams apple.

 

[The DoggFather]

Man hands, man jaw, hiding the adams apple.

View attachment 6391

View attachment 6392

The fuck is that thing in the green?

BURN IT!

SEND IT BACK TO HELL!