If true that will just about do me. Warning... long winded rant below, scroll on if you must.
The NRL wonder why fans are becoming disillusioned and yet they allow this sort of shenanigans to continue. I thought that contracts weren't allowed to be registered below a reasonable market value? We seriously need some transparency in the whole salary cesspool.
For my own two bob I still think the only way to achieve transparency is to rank a player from 0 to 10 (or assign a fixed dollar value) and the total of player rankings in a squad couldn't exceed a set value, say 100 for first grade, 75 for NSW/QLD cup, and 50 for NYC.
Players like Jonathan Thurston and Mitch Newton would be a ten, untried NYC rookies would be the lowest value. The rating of a player is set for the duration of contract, so if a player develops in to a ten the good luck to that club. As an incentive to clubs they get discounts on players they are resigning or juniors they have developed. Clubs can pay players whatever they like.
Probably way to simplistic, but as a random musing from an unhinged mind I can't think of a much more transparent system. The current system certainly is not transparent... of course if Inwas a Broncos or Storm fan I'd love it.
Anyways, apologies for that.