A few on here reckon Lewis should be a centre. If that gets him to Melbourne then I’ll believe he’s a centre too.From all reports, Melbourne will only release him if they get a player in return. So who goes the other way from the dogs? Given the fact he is better than all our backs do we really care who goes to Melbourne? I would only be disappointed if it was Averillo.
Indeed.!!The media keep saying he's a done deal at a different club every where whether it be Souths, us or the Tigers.. I'll wait til he's confirmed somewhere before I react.
Obsessed much? Probably have a folder where you have all these screenshots saved. Stalker much?!!!OK. As opposed to:
View attachment 17665
I'll go as far as to say that there's no way we're in for him, and haven't been for a while. Happy to be wrong but ..Article really says nothing. The three clubs mentioned are easy to pin JAC to: Bulldogs in need of talent and have money, Tigers where he came from and Souths where his mate Mitchell is along with the obvious indigenous link. As I understand it the Dogs have baulked at his asking price. I’d be surprised if he ends up at Belmore and slotting him into fullback could well blow up in our face anyway.
They also having him playing as a lock and hooker.. so we can sell it to Melbourne that they'd be getting a half, hooker, lock, centre in exchange for a winger... .....A few on here reckon Lewis should be a centre. If that gets him to Melbourne then I’ll believe he’s a centre too.
if you think about this a little deeper, is it possible we are driving up JACs value for the Tigers knowing it prices them out of Harry Grant if he becomes available? The politics is intriguing...If we sign jac, and grant is available, does it mean more money for tigers and less for us in bidding war?