Tassie Devil
Kennel Immortal
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2018
- Messages
- 17,187
- Reaction score
- 15,013
The Governor has spoken ...Well anyone that says the Club or NRL were correct in suspending JO and CHN need a lesson in the law of torts. First year law will tell you that people going about their daily life should act reasonably. Lord Dening in the House of Lords talked of the duty of care owed by the reasonable man...the man on the Clapham omnibus. No more no less.
How is this relevant? The facts in this case are that the girl WAS NOT attending the training session. The players owed a duty of care to the participants but NOT to other members of the community who could of been present. The girl...a member of the community and another girl from the community approached the players seeking sexual gratification.
In this day and age of social media young women are sexual predators.
While the Club may not of wanted the players to indulge females in the community on this trip did they inform the players of this wish? Even if they did, is this wish realistic given the freedoms fought so hard to protect by our servicemen and women in the past?
JO and CHN need to be reinstated immediately, otherwise the Club may as well start arranging the marriages for the entire playing group because obviously players contracted to Clubs in the NRL have no right to decide who and when they sleep with a woman in the community otherwise.
In all seriousness, who really knows? Not one of us is privy to all of the information from this case so we're all just speculating. Time will tell whether it was the correct decision or not.
Think your post will get a few bites though so well done ....