- Joined
- Jun 26, 2015
- Messages
- 6,425
- Reaction score
- 5,247
They did it, everybody knows they did it.I guess you must be a witness in the trial to know they are guilty then.
Hopefully DPP can get 11 jurors to agree.
They did it, everybody knows they did it.I guess you must be a witness in the trial to know they are guilty then.
No of course not. Not everyone tells the truth but what I theorized was that all parties should be believed until evidence or statements are truthfully evaluated by police or courts.Sorry but I don't believe all women. There are plenty who make things up like the one at Coffs Harbour for instance. That is part of the problem, that people make things up (on both sides). Another thing (apart from this particular case) it would help if people reported these things immediately rather than in some instance wait 10 or 30 years down the track. If you are going to make an accusation, you need to do it at the time. Doing it so much later will only hurt the case.
As I said previously, I hope all guilty parties go to jail, but it ain't that easy to tell sometimes.
Sorry how can you say that?The evidence weighs in his favour, that doesn't mean he didn't do it though, we just need to wait and see.
What the actual fuck is this post?Sorry how can you say that?
Because it's simply not true.
The defence in fact has zero evidence. Their only strategy is to bring into question the women's sworn statement as being inaccurate.
All of the testimony & summation from the first trial is online.
The first jury hung, that's true. However the majority were for guilty. There were discrepancy in minor details as stated in the sworn statements from the 19 year old women than what was shown on CCTV. I note the crown prosecutor spoke to that today in the court.
I know they did it, everybody knows they did it the dog down the street knows they did it and I really hope they get them.
I agree with most of what you are saying here but not all. Generalising for either sex is wrong. For example you said "If a guy is assaulted you fight back or are outraged to seek vengeance" is not necessarily true. Not everybody can fight back.No of course not. Not everyone tells the truth but what I theorized was that all parties should be believed until evidence or statements are truthfully evaluated by police or courts.
That does not happen at present. People say shes a slut with buyers remorse. Others say the guys are entitled boneheads who take what they want regards of the females wishes.
Yes the female lied at Coffs ...that can happen just like all other criminal incidents like road rage, street fights whatever. People lie. A sexual assault accusation should be handled in exactly the same way and investigated the same. The "victim" should not be judged any differently than any other accuser.....like say a boy who says they got bashed by a man at the train station. Because its a female, they shouldnt be called a slut with buyers remorse. All circumstances should be tested on evidence...not pre-judged.
If the cops did that, the accusations against the team would have been dismissed early on.
As for historical sexual assault cases.
Women are different to men and shame and intimidation is the driving force in not reporting.
If a guy is assaulted you fight back or are outraged to seek vengence.
Women's make up rarely allows them to do that.
Sometimes it takes years and years to face the shame of being raped or violated. Its a very personal feeling that thoroughly robs a woman of her self respect.
There's a lot more I could explain but men can help by understanding that aspect of why it can take a long time to face this emotional turmoil of telling someone about your horrible, soul destroying experience.
When I said "fight back" I meant both physically and mentally....its a fundamental difference between males and females (and I am very much generalising on individual responses of course).I agree with most of what you are saying here but not all. Generalising for either sex is wrong. For example you said "If a guy is assaulted you fight back or are outraged to seek vengeance" is not necessarily true. Not everybody can fight back.
It also may take time for someone to get over their attack, but the longer you wait, the harder it is to prove that the attack happened. That's why a lot of historical cases can't be proven. They also CAN be less believable in some people's minds. It's a difficult one because you don't want somebody to get away with it either, which is why it needs to be reported early on. Can it be reported early on & when the victim gains enough courage to pursue it then the charge be made?
Can you post the article because all i see is 'no cookies'
I spose there's no fukin milk eitherCan you post the article because all i see is 'no cookies'
some Police prosecutors can be scum bags in the courtroom themselves. that's disappointing to read your comment.Four & a half years as a police prosecutor tells me the squinty fuck is as guilty as sin. I don't know for sure........ but I feel it.
Why? You think that he didn't do it?some Police prosecutors can be scum bags in the courtroom themselves. that's disappointing to read your comment.
Just click on the link i provided and you can see the text messages.Can you post the article because all i see is 'no cookies'
I want to see justice prevail either way as im sure most men would. facts and evidence or the system fails.Why? You think that he didn't do it?
Can't see anything on there. Just an advertisement to subscribe to the paper.Just click on the link i provided and you can see the text messages.
My goodness there are some vile woman in this world.
Pay wall mate.
it appears to be the case. But that's not particularly unusual.Am I right in saying that the jury have been deliberating since yesterday?
Yep. But to my understanding, it suggests that they haven't been able to decide a guilty verdict immediately.it appears to be the case. But that's not particularly unusual.
There's 5 charges i think, so it might be a matter of guilty for some and not for others.Yeah usually the longer they deliberate the less likely it is a guilty verdict