Inside Infor & success rates

[chisdog]

There are a lot of people who claim to have inside sources & there are arguments all over the place.

How about adding something to people's profile to say:

Information put forward

Information correct

% correct

If they want they can provide sources to the mods

Then by that we can work out for our selves based on fact who is reliable & who isn't. It may cut out a lot of the bull crap rumours.

 

[Mr Invisible]

Problem is that anyone can say (or claim) anything, source or not. They can also blag on their claimed sources.

In the same way someone could claim to be Todd Greenbergs son, there is really no way to prove otherwise except in real life.

With the changing of the guard, a lot of sources people once had will no doubt have changed/left.

 

[chisdog]

Problem is that anyone can say (or claim) anything, source or not. They can also blag on their claimed sources.

In the same way someone could claim to be Todd Greenbergs son, there is really no way to prove otherwise except in real life.

With the changing of the guard, a lot of sources people once had will no doubt have changed/left.

That's right but if their information turns out to be wrong time & time again, no-one will take notice of them any more. All they want is to big note themselves & make themselves out to be a somebody when they are just a nobody like most of us.

 

[Typical dog]

I know a person who is involved within the club..... and he doesn't tell me fuck all.... Fuckin prick he is.