Straight18
Kennel Enthusiast
- Joined
- May 5, 2018
- Messages
- 2,042
- Reaction score
- 1,152
Give it up hes got u covered again bradYou just have to look at who we've lost and who we've gained.
Give it up hes got u covered again bradYou just have to look at who we've lost and who we've gained.
What he's saying doesn't add up. I don't want to repeat myself for you so read what I wrote and go look for yourself.Give it up hes got u covered again brad
The Broncos can say the same thing.. i actually thought all the Gold Coast trys in first half to lead 22-0 were BS:1st Try
1. Error (drop ball) - Wakeham
2. Two slow props in cover defence/broken play
Bullshit try - Wakeham blunder
2nd Try
1. No kick pressure on Brooks - RFM lazy at marker jogging, Britt jogging
2. Error (drop ball) - Holland
Bullshit try - Holland blunder
3rd Try
1. Foran flys in, isn't a dominant tackle
2. Miss tackle - Sue
3. This is ridiculous, one of RFM or Foran had to wrap up the ball
Bullshit try - how can't four defenders stop a player having a second dig when already over the try line? The ball is the most important thing when over the line...
4th Try
1. Penalty (high tackle) - Foran (Nofaluma ducked into it - bullshit penalty)
2. Holland and DWZ probably should of done better there, Talau still had a lot of work to do
Game over at this point
5th Try
1. Intercept - Foran, all or nothing play
6th Try
1. Wakeham falls for the worst dummy ever by Brooks, gives the Tigers ~50 metres.
2. Players out of position/offside, bad read/tackle by Foran who's on the wing - didn't trust Elliott on Leilua
7th Try
1. Penalty (high tackle) - Napa
2. Six again penalty - DWZ
3. Bad tackle by JMK (who had support from Holland), playing out of position, out muscled by Doueihi
I'd also like to add that we completely lost the ruck. Too many quick play the balls from the Tigers and Grant took advantage of that and carved us up. We also had no ball, especially in the final third so we didn't even get to see an attack.
Losing our most influential player in attack/scoring tries this season a couple of minutes in was also a massive blow. We also had to reshuffle our team. DWZ was also last man in defence on a couple of the tries, we know Hopoate is better defensively.
Overall the result and scoreline wasn't good enough. A couple of bullshit tries at the start really set the scene.
If you have something constructive to add (I can miss things) you can post in the comments.
Hmmm.. pretty sure we’re not putting a beano towards Reynolds.From memory it's a few more than 2 or 3;
Foran, back ended contract, not signed in Pay's time
Tolman, back ended contract not signed in Pay's time
Montoya, not signed in Pay's time
Elliott, not signed in Pay's time
Holland, not signed in Pay's time
Plus as far as I know Wakeham and RFM had agreed to contract extensions before Pay was appointed but they were announced afterwards
Although they weren't playing for us in 2018/19/20 we were still possibly paying part of Mbye, Reynolds, Woods and Graham which severely limited how much we could spend whilst still registering 30 players (ie; we had to recruit cheapies to fill the spots). It's easy to claim that we didn't sign any quality players, but the reason for that is we couldn't fit them in the Cap. Which is exactly what we were told would happen until it was cleared in 2021.
Go Dogs
I remember the Broncos didn't play to the whistle for one of the tries, I think it was the second one. Even if you think it's 100% a knock on you have to play to the whistle because it's really 99%.The Broncos can say the same thing.. i actually thought all the Gold Coast trys in first half to lead 22-0 were BS:
1) Taylor try from dummy half - poor 1 on 1
2) Knock on/forward pass try
3) Bris FB dropped bomb GC picked up and scored
4) Intercept on HT
= 22-0 at HT
Players forgetting to play a game and too worked up. All the coaching in the world is useless if the players collectively play as if they are scared to make a mistake.Looks like players who lack good coaching.
When was it said Manly were left with back-ended deals when Hasler first left?Whoopty doo....they have taken great mileage out of this.
So manly had back ended deals, that hasler left them with, yet they were still competitive, made semi finals, didn't make a big frigging deal about it...but see they have successful international businessmen running their joint
Well that’s at least 1.1m over isn’t it, given that the 2018 cap ended up being 9.4m. But no problem there I take it, because it was ‘mooted’ .Millions over....rubbish, pure speculation and scaremongering by the current board.
Dib estimated the cap was going to be 10.5M as per previous discussions with the Nrl, that number was definitely mooted by the nrl but not ratified in the end.
It was actually 100%, you need to try really hard and be much betterYou know I was only out by 9% or 6%. So much shame I know I’ll try and be better.
But they still had Manu, Topou, Keary, JWH, Taukeiaho (that's hard to spell), Cordner, Crichton and Friend. That's how many international and/or SOO players? Compared to nil, zip zilch, diddly squat, SFA that we have.Roosters lose Tedesco, Morris, Radley and Verrills on game day and still had players filled in. Even if we had those 4in our team we would still get flogged.
The Cap is not the problem, following on from this boards direction and Haslers structures plus Cleals recruitment is at fault.
Wrong, the players I’ve mentioned plus the ones you have absolutely proves that the Cap excuse this board relies on is a lie. How do we not even have at least 25% of the qualities they do. The players mentioned total 11 for the roosters, how is 4 quality players that the supposed repaired cap for next years going to get anywhere near the others clubs. Our problem is not money it’s the stupid structures and recruitment policies started by Hasler. The previous board got rid of him but only after it was too late to save them. The Anderson led board do not have the credentials that previous board had, they fixed nothing player wise and are the ones responsible for damaging the brand.But they still had Manu, Topou, Keary, JWH, Taukeiaho (that's hard to spell), Cordner, Crichton and Friend. That's how many international and/or SOO players? Compared to nil, zip zilch, diddly squat, SFA that we have.
How do you think they fit those players in and we can't (sombrero and brown paper bags aside)? The Cap is absolutely the problem, from which we get some relief next year.
Go Dogs
Our problem isn't money, we have plenty (Covid-19 notwithstanding), our problem is Cap space versus the mandated 30 players. The Chooks Cap system runs much like Melbourne's, they have a core of around 1/3 of their roster (~10 out of 30) with quality players. Then ~1/3rd with up and coming players, not many locals, but players they recruit early in their careers. Then the final 1/3rd that are "roster fillers", second string, can fill in when required, not used all that often, can be moved on easily. As I posted previously they rotate around 1/3rd of their roster every year (eg; there is 9 off contract this and 11 next year). This roster is then aligned with a Cap structure that uses a bit over 1/2 the Cap on the first 10 players, then splits around a 1/4 each between the other 20 players.Wrong, the players I’ve mentioned plus the ones you have absolutely proves that the Cap excuse this board relies on is a lie. How do we not even have at least 25% of the qualities they do. The players mentioned total 11 for the roosters, how is 4 quality players that the supposed repaired cap for next years going to get anywhere near the others clubs. Our problem is not money it’s the stupid structures and recruitment policies started by Hasler. The previous board got rid of him but only after it was too late to save them. The Anderson led board do not have the credentials that previous board had, they fixed nothing player wise and are the ones responsible for damaging the brand.
There is no way in hell they can hide behind the Cap situation and justify the roster we have. We were deficient in certain positions which they failed to strengthen so we can at least remain competitive. I’m not asking that we have superstars in every position but where we were lacking they didn’t recruit.
We all know in hindsight that the power Hasler had been given was wrong but that’s a lesson learned to never do it again, remember we had Tedesco, Moses and Woods coming only for Hasler to veto it for Foran. If we had them in the squad plus a decent hooker can you imagine the squad that’s could have been built around that in the 4 years since.
Only because you enjoy a good correction yourself.. But, Jackson, DWZ, Foran, and Hoppa have all represented their country's (Australia, NZ and Tonga) and Hoppa, Jackson and Nappa are all ex S.O.O players so not exactly Nil, Zilch, didley squat etc.But they still had Manu, Topou, Keary, JWH, Taukeiaho (that's hard to spell), Cordner, Crichton and Friend. That's how many international and/or SOO players? Compared to nil, zip zilch, diddly squat, SFA that we have.
How do you think they fit those players in and we can't (sombrero and brown paper bags aside)? The Cap is absolutely the problem, from which we get some relief next year.
Go Dogs
Good points, deserve answers. Jackson got old (and a bit worn down) and Foran got injured (more than once). As for Napa, he is an enigma, sorry I can't answer that one.Only because you enjoy a good correction yourself.. But, Jackson, DWZ, Foran, and Hoppa have all represented their country's (Australia, NZ and Tonga) and Hoppa, Jackson and Nappa are all ex S.O.O players so not exactly Nil, Zilch, didley squat etc.
I would probably go further and ask why are they still not playing S.O.O and when did they start to go off the boil form wise that took them out of representative calculation??
Wasn't my point. Just as a good coach can lift a player to aspire to reach new heights, the wrong coach can have the opposite effect. I loved Dean as a player but its not translating.. Jackson got old because of the way he was being used, Foran got injured multiple times but still good enough to get selected for NZ, Napa showed at the roosters that he could bring aggression and was used mostly from the bench and yet we buy him and play him as a stating prop?Good points, deserve answers. Jackson got old (and a bit worn down) and Foran got injured (more than once). As for Napa, he is an enigma, sorry I can't answer that one.
Go Dogs
We’re heading in the right direction.Can’t wait to read how we conceded 9 bullshit tries on Sunday night
It’s funny because when we win those nothing games at the back end (like we prob will do again this season) all Pays supporters come out in force and sing from the rooftops and talk smack over summer about how ‘next season we will do well ‘ on the basis of those meaningless winsWhat I don’t get is, how do these “not good enough players” beat good teams at the end of the last 2 years?