Seems a bit too airy fairy TT. You aren't acknowledging the problems or the poor results obtained by any of these coaches and high performance staff you talk of.
It isnt working and there are inherent problems with effort and motivation et that dont appear to be solved by any of these people you appear to have so much faith in.
Obviously I acknowledge the win versus loss results are poor, I'm just as unhappy as any Bulldog's supporter. But maybe the results are representative of the current playing group that we put on the field each week, that's the best that they can produce. Inconsistency is just part of that, we can play well during a game, but not the whole game. We can play well for a whole game, but not every game.
There is plenty of history of a good team of players not working with the coach, change the coach and suddenly the team gels. Is that because the new coach is a genius? Is it because the old coach was an idiot? Not always, sometimes it's just timing, the same players needed the extra games experience playing together and the new coach arrived at just the right time. Warriors this year, prime example.
There is also plenty of history of an average team of players not working with a great coach, add a few players and suddenly the team gels even when a very average coach takes over. Sometimes it's just the handful of players that make a huge difference, for example us in 2009 when we added Brett Kimmorley, Josh Morris, Michael Ennis, David Stagg, Ben Hannant and Greg Eastwood with Kevin Moore as the coach. Does anyone really think changing the coach made that difference?
In regards to points for and against, I see that as a factor more related to "speeding up the game", set restarts, shot clocks on everything, etc. It makes it very difficult for a team that gets behind to grind out a win, something Bulldogs are famous for. It's very difficult to come back from a large deficit in possession, teams get on role and there is no chance to recover from the fatigue. Last night Tigers and Sharks is a prime example, 12 all at half time, Sharks get on role in the 2nd half and it's 36 to 12 at full time.
Always a Bulldog