Careful, you might be labelled racist if you don't follow the media's agenda...I’ve been really interested because I’m a cop. Originally I thought the cops were obviously guilty but after seeing the evidence in court it’s pretty clear Floyd died of a drug over dose complicated by his existing medical conditions.
From what I've seen it seems a lot of the charges he has are going to be very hard to prove without a doubt and as you mentioned, it is look pretty clear from the evidence that Floyd had died of the drug overdose mixed with complications from existing medical conditions.I’ve been really interested because I’m a cop. Originally I thought the cops were obviously guilty but after seeing the evidence in court it’s pretty clear Floyd died of a drug over dose complicated by his existing medical conditions.
It's definitely going to be a very difficult trial. The medical evidence isn't clear cut so the defence can safely argue that he may have died due to the drugs and medical conditions, and the prosecution can argue that the officer's efforts are the trigger that caused the death, and neither can be fully confirmed.I’ve been really interested because I’m a cop. Originally I thought the cops were obviously guilty but after seeing the evidence in court it’s pretty clear Floyd died of a drug over dose complicated by his existing medical conditions.
That's exactly whats going to happen, innocent = riots.From what I've seen it seems a lot of the charges he has are going to be very hard to prove without a doubt and as you mentioned, it is look pretty clear from the evidence that Floyd had died of the drug overdose mixed with complications from existing medical conditions.
I feel like there is pressure to get a guilty verdict, especially from people looking outside in. There is definitely a lot of tension involved around this case.
I think if he gets off we will see a repeat of the L.A Riots.
I reckon some American cops can be heavy handed but I don’t see it in this case.What about the actual actions of the cop?
Excessive under the circumstances when Floyd was already cuffed?
Various bystanders calling out to confirm he was loosing consciousness and that the officer should therefore release him from the knee to the throat?
Essentially it could be argued the cop displayed careless disregard. Hands in pocket. Still determinedly applying pressure to a prone, handcuffed, obviously breathing distressed perp? assailant? person?
The street witnesses and shop assistant eye witnesses are all giving very emotional testimony.
Officer could get off murder but will have to pay some sort of price, along with his buddies, otherwise yeah can see LA all over again.
i think that will eventually be where the judgement will lie? Were his actions a reasonable use of force and restraint.
Agree with what you say but the cops didn't know of the drug use at the time.I reckon some American cops can be heavy handed but I don’t see it in this case.
The issue is that the facts of the case don’t support the idea that any of the cops intentionally killed The bloke. As in they didn’t consciously ‘want’ to kill him. That is what needs to be proven for murder.
i doubt manslaughter can be proven either. Especially given Floyd had Covid, heart complications, a very lengthy history of drug addiction and the worst part is that there is video showing the bloke swallowing fentanyl pills just as the cops approached him.
I agree it looks bad on first viewing but once you dig into it you learn more.Agree with what you say but the cops didn't know of the drug use at the time.
It looks like overkill to me and break down of duty of care. The guy was erratic but chilled even in the initial contact. Then was agitated but compliant and handcuffed BEHIND his back. No way the police could rightly assume they were in danger.
The cop who personally knew him was derelict in his duty to serve and protect (to the letter of the law).
The job is thankless and be very fraught over there with ghetto crime, drugs and gun carrying by almost everyone.
You still need cops acting lawfully and who aren't on power trips tho. Several of the pleading bystanders demanding he stop were firefighters or other Govt officers who offered resusitation assistance...they could tell of the impending bad outcome.
The Minneapolis police dept have never trained officers in his method of control so Chauvin just applied it at his own discretion.
I believe Chauvin has other complaints made against him.
Not according to court testimony from a serving officer.I agree it looks bad on first viewing but once you dig into it you learn more.
The Minneapolis police dept does train their officers to use a knee on the neck:https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgo...ses/27-CR-20-12951-TKL/Exhibit67807072020.pdf
Uses the same memes lolSurely this bloke is Dawgfather haha
These articles are showing half the story. It’s not showing how the defence lawyers are picking apart the “expert” testimonies after this. The defence has even decided to call a prosecution witness as their own witness when the time comes.[
Not according to court testimony from a serving officer.
Top homicide detective says Derek Chauvin kneeling on George Floyd was 'totally unnecessary'
Top homicide detective says Derek Chauvin kneeling on George Floyd was 'totally unnecessary' | CNN
The Minneapolis Police Department's top homicide detective testified that kneeling on George Floyd's neck after he had been handcuffed was "totally unnecessary," saying that "if your knee is on someone's neck -- that could kill them."www.cnn.com
He went from a covid marshall to a cop lolUses the same memes lol