Ezra Mam alleged positive drug test after car crash

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Fox stuffs up for not having a monthly 360 show during the offseason.

They could do 1.5hrs that covers news, recruitment/retention, off-season behaviour etc.
They could play games from a particular season during the off-season as well, but no, they play 15 minute highlight crap.
 
Buzz needs to investigate that haha...and make himself a lot more relevant a journo for a change ...but won't lol.
Edit: Everyone who agrees this needs investigating, pls put on a laugh react lol
That's not how journalism works anymore. Now all you do is troll through social media each day & report rumours as fact - See Tony Adams.
 
I bet theyve been paid to stfu. Weird how we haven’t seen the families retaliate or 9 news go after their story. News limited protecting their 1 product again
It is odd in these days of litigation and the complications for the victims of Mam being unlicensed and uninsured.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kaz
Now all you do is troll through social media each day & report rumours as fact - See Tony Adams.

Same thing happens here.

I posted a rumour about my team & it was posted here.



©
 
I bet theyve been paid to stfu. Weird how we haven’t seen the families retaliate or 9 news go after their story. News limited protecting their 1 product again

Channel 9 news had interviews with the mother several times. (Bailey Kenzie is the reporters name)


Uber driver speaking.


ABC news take on the court case


I am trying to find the interviews from them both talking about the fines etc.

Ever thought their lawyers have told them to STFU.



©
 
Once people boo him he will claim it’s racist and want it acted on. Watch.
Will claim racism and get support from certain player at Souths. Lucky for Ezra the NRL schedules Broncos away games at Suncorp.
 
Same thing happens here.

I posted a rumour about my team & it was posted here.



©

Was it a rumour Kaz?

I have evidence here that you gave your grandson his Xmas present....

1000000398.jpg
 
Channel 9 news had interviews with the mother several times. (Bailey Kenzie is the reporters name)


Uber driver speaking.


ABC news take on the court case


I am trying to find the interviews from them both talking about the fines etc.

Ever thought their lawyers have told them to STFU.



©
We pay ctp for a reason. So if you injure someone you get a reputable pay out. So Ezra drove not licenced nor insured. Take your head out of the sand if you don’t think it all sounds warped. I lost my licence in 2020 when I moved houses after breaking from my ex. We owned our house and I was renting and didn’t update my address. In Qld I got caught driving and was fined 1600 for being unlicensed and uninsured .. ( my renewal letter got sent to my previous home ). Even though I told them I had no idea it didn’t matter I lost licence for 6 months and got fined almost double what he did. If I injured someone I could have been sent to jail. Stinks of corruption
 
You are all getting the pox now. lol

The Buzz lovers are out in force.

Wonder if Buzzy would ban me, if I posted on twitter for him to EAD. Just have to remember my password & username



©
Buzz would have to take Nicho’s dick out of his mouth before he could even consider eating another?
 
We pay ctp for a reason. So if you injure someone you get a reputable pay out. So Ezra drove not licenced nor insured. Take your head out of the sand if you don’t think it all sounds warped. I lost my licence in 2020 when I moved houses after breaking from my ex. We owned our house and I was renting and didn’t update my address. In Qld I got caught driving and was fined 1600 for being unlicensed and uninsured .. ( my renewal letter got sent to my previous home ). Even though I told them I had no idea it didn’t matter I lost licence for 6 months and got fined almost double what he did. If I injured someone I could have been sent to jail. Stinks of corruption
CTP (compulsory 3rd party) is with the vehicle, it's a requirement for its registration. I think it would be safe to say that the car manufacturer and/or dealership that gives him the vehicle would have registered it hence a CTP would be in place in their name.

Note the "3rd party" terminology, that means not the driver of car #1 or the driver of car #2, the 3rd party/parties would be the passengers in the Uber. Hence their medical bills, loss of work etc would be covered by Mams vehicle's CTP.

The important question in this case would refer to the comprehensive insurance that it would be reasonable to assume was taken out by the car manufacturer and/or dealership that gave Mam the vehicle. Most comprehensive insurance policies require that the driver of the vehicle be licensed and, in some policies, that the driver be not intoxicated or drug driving. Since Mam was both of those that could mean the comprehensive policy would be invalidated. In those sorts of case it is quite common for the driver to be personally responsible for repairing/replacing both vehicles by the insurance company.

I would say the chances of the Donkeys paying are pretty much guaranteed, for the repairs to both and/or the written off cost if they aren't repairable. Once again Mam escapes what a "normal person" would be paying for.



Team First
 
CTP (compulsory 3rd party) is with the vehicle, it's a requirement for its registration. I think it would be safe to say that the car manufacturer and/or dealership that gives him the vehicle would have registered it hence a CTP would be in place in their name.

Note the "3rd party" terminology, that means not the driver of car #1 or the driver of car #2, the 3rd party/parties would be the passengers in the Uber. Hence their medical bills, loss of work etc would be covered by Mams vehicle's CTP.

The important question in this case would refer to the comprehensive insurance that it would be reasonable to assume was taken out by the car manufacturer and/or dealership that gave Mam the vehicle. Most comprehensive insurance policies require that the driver of the vehicle be licensed and, in some policies, that the driver be not intoxicated or drug driving. Since Mam was both of those that could mean the comprehensive policy would be invalidated. In those sorts of case it is quite common for the driver to be personally responsible for repairing/replacing both vehicles by the insurance company.

I would say the chances of the Donkeys paying are pretty much guaranteed, for the repairs to both and/or the written off cost if they aren't repairable. Once again Mam escapes what a "normal person" would be paying for.



Team First

Lets pretend the insurance is paid by an insurance company owned a sponsor. And are willing to pay it out) Most major insurance companies own the 'smaller' ones

Mam doesn't pay a thing. (Except fines) Lol

Remember this is pretend.



©
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top