News Doggone it: Montoya try should've been given, says Annesley

jof

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
2,633
Reaction score
8,426
NRL head of football Graham Annesley has conceded the Bulldogs were denied a possible try to Marcelo Montoya in the first half of the side's two-point loss to the Eels on Sunday.

Montoya was in a position to finish off a set move on the left edge but on-field referee Chris Sutton penalised Raymond Faitala-Mariner for impeding Mitchell Moses in the lead-up.

Rather than allow the try-scoring opportunity to continue, Sutton made the decision without the assistance of the NRL Bunker. However, Annesley confirmed the call was worthy of a second opinion and was confident if the incident was referred, the Bulldogs should have received the green light. Canterbury conceded a try to Eels captain Clint Gutherson five minutes later.

"Raymond Faitala-Mariner looks like he might receive the ball and you can see Moses right in front of him squaring up ready to tackle him," Annesley said on Monday.

"He certainly thinks he's going to receive the ball. The ball goes behind Faitala-Mariner and Moses goes in and makes the tackle he was always going to make.

"In this case, we'd call that a poor defensive read. That is not an obstruction in the way that obstructions are determined in the modern game."

Annesley said he would continue to back referees to make a call on the paddock but they had the tools on this occasion to back up the decision.

Annesley: Who is to blame in aerial collisions?

"I think if he [Sutton] had his time again, he probably would let it play out," he said.

"They were in a try-scoring situation and he always had the option if they scored to go back and check for obstruction.

"We've talked in the past of the referees relying too much on the Bunker, so in some ways, you've got to give the referee some kudos for having the courage of his conviction.

"But, if you're going to do that, you need to come up with the right decision, but it wasn't the right decision.

"I'm absolutely confident that if that had gone to the Bunker, that would have been ruled as a poor defensive read and a try."

It ended up proving a costly decision for the Bulldogs, who were mounting a comeback in the second half but fell short to an Eels side who lacked a killer blow in the final 40 minutes.

Meanwhile, Annesley had no issue with a deliberate pass to the sidelines from Maika Sivo in the final play of the game after claims he deliberately threw it forward, saying the ball went backwards out of his hands as he flung it over the sideline.
 

Typical dog

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 22, 2017
Messages
2,114
Reaction score
4,496
Yeah thanks for nothing. At least suspend the ref for 1 game. Players get suspended for making a mistake with a high tackle. This dog cost us the game
 

EXPLORER

Kennel Immortal
Gilded
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
15,743
Reaction score
7,933
Oh well,
Fuck me shit happens.
When you on the bottom nothing goes your way.
 

Bluebody

The Strategist
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
4,413
Reaction score
2,778
This was predictable - the apology that means naught.

So the question is, why did he not want the Bulldogs to have a chance of a try by going to the bunker? The only thing he had to gain for rushing that decision was to deny the Dogs a possible try. Why was he so eager to assume something when a try was on the line? The short answer is confirmation bias. He was so vested in the Dogs being penalised and denied a try, he saw and interpreted the play to meet his emotional attachment to punishing the Dogs. But the Ref boss can't factor that in - Society, the media and the NRL are too stupid to factor in the undeniable dimension of confirmation bias that is clearly on display and causing costly errors like this one.
 
Last edited:

The DoggFather

ASSASSIN
Premium Member
Gilded
Site's Top Poster
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
107,458
Reaction score
119,603
Means fuck all, doesn't get us our deserved points and doesn't address the clear and continuing rort.

For the doubters, not going to the KFC bunker is evidence of a rort.
 

ddt192

The Blue N White Butcher Stripe
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
3,787
Reaction score
7,166
Fuckin dogs
 

Suave

Kennel Participant
Joined
Nov 3, 2019
Messages
468
Reaction score
1,403
It was a rort and a horrible call but we should’ve challenged. We shouldn’t have even hesitated given we scored a try. Made it that much worse
 

flamebouyant

Kennel Legend
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
10,076
Reaction score
14,909
It was a rort and a horrible call but we should’ve challenged. We shouldn’t have even hesitated given we scored a try. Made it that much worse
I dont think any team has made a captains challenge on a denied try like that have they??
 

NPC83

Kennel Addict
Gilded
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
6,765
Reaction score
10,450
Reminds me of 2001 when Parra and dogs were top of the table and Anasta in his debut season passed to Talau for the winning try and it was called a forward pass.. I think we rioted that night..
 

Roll the Bones

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Apr 27, 2007
Messages
4,406
Reaction score
8,230
It's not without precedent for the Eels this year. Remember the horrendous 'forward pass' call against Manly in the 80th minute, which Parra-scum ended up winning 19-16.
 

NPC83

Kennel Addict
Gilded
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
6,765
Reaction score
10,450
It's not without precedent for the Eels this year. Remember the horrendous 'forward pass' call against Manly in the 80th minute, which Parra-scum ended up winning 19-16.
Painfully yes.. Manly was the leg that went down in my multi that week...
 

Novdoggie

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 19, 2016
Messages
3,391
Reaction score
4,565
In earlier rounds Parra won against Manly in the last couple seconds with an incorrect forward pass given in their favour and now this. They are the fake side of the top four
 

TABOO

Kennel Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
2,740
Reaction score
3,921
It was a rort and a horrible call but we should’ve challenged. We shouldn’t have even hesitated given we scored a try. Made it that much worse
Wouldn't have mattered. Even if the challenge was successful, they wouldn't give the try, they would've just given us the ball back.

It's just straight up bullshit and typical of the nrl.
 
Top